Victims of Science

in Proof of Brain3 years ago


Image by Stefan Keller from Pixabay

"Doctors peered through thick glass and timed their convulsions, watching as the woman sprawled over her child in a futile effort to save her from the gas".

Introduction

Image by blackrabbitkdj from Pixabay

I know not why people do evil. One cause may be the dark nature of the human soul. Another reason may be due to a high-level intelligence coupled with zero morality.

Finally, evil may come to pass in the guise of good intentions. After all, you can't pave your way to hell without them.

These are some stories where morality is in question or nowhere to be found. No matter the reason for the experiments presented today, the result was trauma and suffering for the victims of science in their day.

For the Good of the Child

Image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay

Cauterization circumcision destroyed his penis. At the age of 38, he took his own life.

David Peter Reimer and his brother were identical twins. When they were about 7-months old, they developed phimosis. Phimosis is a condition where the foreskin appears defective and makes for difficult urination.

Doctors had an idea. They could perform an easy circumcision to remove the problematic foreskin to eliminate the problem. Implementation of this solution came in the form of an inexperienced doctor and defective equipment. The result was a maimed 7-month old David Peter Reimer.

Doctors had another idea. Since they monumentally screwed up this procedure, they should wait to see if the phimosis would go away naturally. It did. Avoiding the method spared David's twin brother Brian from potential maiming.

Concerned about David's well-being, his parents had no idea how to help their son. They could try and have his penis reconstructed, but there was no proof that it would ever function normally. John Money, an arrogant yet cunning psychologist, told his parents that if they just raised David as a girl given proper hormonal therapy, the child would group up happy. The parents consented and did as recommended. However, the treatments never took. Their son David never accepted the changes occurring within him. Money, on the other hand, only reported the brilliant success of the Reimer case.

At the age of 14, David stopped accepting any more treatments and learned the truth from his father. David began readjusting to a male body and even got a reconstructed penis. Over the years, he fell in love, got married, and adopted children.

During David's traumatizing life experience, John Money made bank. While he suffered, John made sure to exclude any adverse experience from his talks, interviews, or book publications. John made sure he capitalized upon David's fake transgender reports to become a most sought-after expert.

The trauma of his ordeal, however, never escaped him. His life began to unravel after his brother Brian took his own life. Soon after, David took his own.

For the Good of the Hospital

Image by Sasin Tipchai from Pixabay

Libby Zion was a freshman admitted to the New York Cornell Medical Center with complaints of fever and other abnormalities. She didn't leave the hospital alive the following day.

Staying Awake

There are plenty of occupations that require long working hours. If you work a job requiring you to work all day or even during the night, you fall into this category. It's the nature of the job. You need to work to pay for the things you think you need. Eventually, we will become fatigued.

If you're fatigued while you do anything, expect to make mistakes. You aren't as attentive as you think you are during this time. Stop being stubborn and arrogant. Unfortunately, we can't help who we are, but society makes amends. Numerous laws are in place that punishes us, for instance, if we get behind the wheel of a vehicle while we're tired. In my case, worry about fatigue while driving helps drive me to get more sleep or drink coffee before I drive a car.

What about the medical community? Indeed, people with an understanding of medicine know about the impact of fatigue and have processes in place to mitigate risks.

Libby Zion

The medical staff never determined the cause of her fever. The physicians attending her were new. One had less than a year of training while the other had less than two years of training. During Libby's stay at the hospital, medically licensed doctors gave her a mix of chemicals meant to calm her. Instead, it killed her.

I wonder how many situations like this occurred without our knowledge. If this happened to my child, perhaps the world might not hear my cries to the skies. Libby's father, Sidney, however, was a journalist.

Sidney Zion

An influential columnist, Signey's work to discover the cause of her death eventually lead to a grand jury exploring charges of murder, malpractice, and negligence. In 1986, a New York Grand Jury declared that the cause of her death was due to inadequate training, supervision, and fatigue resulting from 36-hour shifts. Some time afterward, New York implemented the first 80-hr maximum resident working hour limit.

Industry Practices

The medical industry has feelings too. They probably felt unjustly punished because of one instance. Who, better than they would know what's best for themselves and their patients. Here's a question. Is there a difference in the impact of patient safety between residents that work reduced or longer hours? Let's find out!

iFirst and iCompare

The medical community decided to conduct experiments throughout participating hospitals. They wanted to know the impact of fatigue resulting from extended working hours on patients. Consent to participate in this study by residents wasn't informed, but instead, implied. Researchers held that if residents wanted to train in their hospitals, then they would like to participate.

No patients were notified of this experiment either by implied or informed consent. The hospitals participating in the studies never told patients as they felt they didn't require notification.

One doctor participating in iCompare referred to a lack of patient consent as an "interesting conundrum". He also stated that while he made errors caused by fatigue, he doesn't know that a shorter or longer shift could have affected the mistakes made.

For the Good of the Children


Image by florentiabuckingham from Pixabay

Wendell Johnson and Mary Tudor

Wendell Johnson experienced much strife in his youth due to stuttering. His condition, as well as a need to overcome it, drove him to prestigious positions in research. He became world-renowned for his efforts in speech therapy. One experiment, in particular, draws our attention today because in his efforts to cure stuttering, he, instead, traumatized children that later became traumatized adults.

Mary Tudor carried out Wendell's experiment on two unsuspecting groups of 22 orphans. Each group consisted of children who both normally and stuttered. One group received positive comments about their performance during speech tests. "Great Job" or "You'll improve no matter what anyone says" were common phrases uttered by the researchers. The other experimental group received negative feedback.

In review, the results of the study were inconclusive. There was no evidence subjecting children to positive or negative feedback either eliminated or caused stuttering. It did, however, demonstrate that it would make children more withdrawn, isolated, and depressed. The experiment impacted some of these children, now adults, decades later. The adults settled with the Iowa University that allowed the study in 2007.

Lauretta Bender

According to the late Lauretta Bender, Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) is a benefit to humanity. It produces positive effects. When applied to children, ECT elicits appropriate behavior. Lauretta believed this so wholly that she subjected children as young as three to the procedure.

Like John Money and Wendell Johnson in this article, Lauretta seems to have published only the positive results of the research. Peer-review of her work showed quite a different picture. In one of her cases, the child subjected to ECT became relatively successful in their life as a lawyer. In another, the child became a multiple-murderer sentenced to life in prison.

For the Good of the War

Image by Brigitte makes custom works from your photos, thanks a lot from Pixabay

A 72-year old Japanese farmer describes his first time performing vivisection on another human being. Vivisection is performing operations for experimentation. During his time in Unit-731, the farmer described cutting into a prisoner from the chest to the stomach.

Unit-731

Unit-731 was a segment of the Japanese army that researched biological warfare. They intended to develop weapons they could deploy against the United States.

The Old Farmer

During a New York Times interview, the old farmer, under conditions of anonymity, stated experiments required a subject's vivisection following infection. Vivisection was warranted to observe the infections' impact on internal organs. The prisoner was dissected alive, but certainly not without reason. If the Japanese used anesthetic on the prisoners, the drugs might interfere with the test results.

Field Tests

You can't deploy a weapon until you test its effectiveness. Horrendous experiments occurred to try the efficiency of any number of biological weapons. The test subjects didn't appear to matter—the Japanese of those times experimented on everyone in their custody.

Unit-731 tested plague bombs by dropping them upon Chinese cities. Through these bombings, they determined their bombs were effective in spreading the plague. Their ultimate goal was to drops bombs of these types upon strategic areas in California.

Russian Mother and Child

One of the more disturbing experiences in Unit-731 involved observation of experiments. Emotionless researchers perpetrated it. In the case of the old farmer, the only emotion he may have exhibited was frustration. It was challenging to carry out your experiments when your test subjects kept screaming.

Part of the interview reveals the story of a russian mother and child and their exposure exposed to chemicals for testing efficacy. The mother, in her desperation, tried to shield her daughter from the effects of the gas. She must have watched her daughter sicken immediately and start convulsing. Watching your child die as you begin to pass yourself surely is an experience fit for hell.

Akira Makino

During WWII, Makino was a surgeon ordered to perform amputations, dissections, and anything else Japan desired on everyone from prisoners to children. Why did he do it? According to Makino, disobedience meant death. Failure to follow his orders meant his superiors would have killed him. Decades later, still haunted by memories, Makino now tells his story along with others so that the message could get out now that they were closer to death.

Accountability

The activities of Unit-731 were horrid beyond comparison but also very difficult to research at my level. It appears that, until recently, no one working within the group talked about Unit-731 activities. I also don't know if any trials have occurred.

Japan claims no responsibility to compensate any victims.

For the Good of the Vaccine

Leah Rosenbaum - Forbes

Hepatitis Vaccine

Dr. Saul Krugman and Joan Giles utilized residents at the Willowbrook State School to perform Hepatitis testing with the hopes of developing a vaccine. Willowbrook ran rampant with cases of Hepatitis already, so infecting patients not having the disease wouldn't have caused so much concern-or, so they thought.

They set out to perform experiments upon "50 mentally disabled children" between 5 and 10 years old. When questioned about the need for human versus animal experimentation, doctors responded that animal experimentation was too expensive. The rationale was that most of the kids would get infected anyway, so possibly getting hepatitis from experimentation would have been out of the ordinary. According to the doctors, the ends justified the means.

Children were infected with the virus and re-infected if they recovered. The intent was to see if the body could develop an immune response. While the research eventually led to a greater understanding of the disease, it was certainly not without its detractors. Scores of people protested at medical conferences. An expose done by Geraldo Rivera eventually led to the passage of laws protecting the rights of patients in institutions.

Yet, Krugman was rewarded for his work despite the controversies. In the same year the Tuskegee experiments were revealed to the public, he headed the American Pediatric Society for his efforts.

COVID-19

We see today similarities between the rush to develop a vaccine for COVID that we did for Hepatitis. The medical industry uses similar methods as Krugman's to develop the COVID-19 vaccine. Patients are given the disease without treatment to determine how long the body would recover. Patients would also be given the plasma of recovered subjects to see if that would speed up recovery.

Animal experimentation would take too long as the world became desperate for protection. The difference, perhaps, in this case, is that the industry didn't use children. As far as I know, all participants in vaccine development were consenting adults. However, history tells us another story about the behaviors of humanity.

In Closing

image.png
Image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay

Thank you for reading and following on throughout my Hive journey. Never stop questioning the world around you.

Is there any topic I haven't covered you would like to read about? Please let me know in the comments below.

** Don't forget to upvote, follow** @scholaris, and comment below! Thank you for reading.


Posted via proofofbrain.io

Sort:  

Thoroughly enjoyed this one and completely agree that one should never stop questioning. Related to the medical procedures, I remember reading a study recently that what doctors advocate for their terminally ill patients and what they choose for themselves when terminally ill are very different.


Posted via proofofbrain.io

Thank you for your response and compliment. If you liked this article, then you may enjoy my next one entitled, "Victims of Justice." I have it prepared and ready for upload, but I would like to try making a video out of it too on 3speak. I figured I would put a link for the 3speak video at the top of the article.

You've also provided a fascinating topic for review. In an article I was able to find, it stated doctors behaved so because they felt the patient should have more control over what they choose. Doctors would, on average, choose procedures that are higher risk with fewer side effects.


Posted via proofofbrain.io

I loved your article, if you doubt many things that must be reflected, I have always said we are a cancer that gradually destroys what it touches or what it possesses. The easiest thing to touch is the world and well, look at how we are, situations out of control, but the main thing is that we know so many failures of science and even so, we trust it although many times they do their work with the world badly. .

Thank you very much for your kind words. I don't think we're cancer. I do think that primal passions blind us. I feel we're still evolving with an intelligence level to match our primitive emotions. We're living in a dangerous world.

I believe in science and what it can provide. My belief, however, isn't blind or malicious. However, to echo your sentiment, most of the world, including scientists, follow science maliciously. COVID-19 is a great example.

In a related story, my kids' doctor has been seeing him since they were born. Since I started them in daycare, they've been catching common daycare maladies that their doctor helped get them through. When the COVID-19 hysteria started, he wouldn't bother seeing them because what they had was COVID-19 related. His behavior was interesting because their symptoms weren't even on the CDC's COVID-19 symptoms list. Odd the way that works. Even some doctors can become hysterical.


Posted via proofofbrain.io

Thanks for posting this in #informationwar <3

I appreciate your response. I'm actually at ease now that you replied. I felt it was a good topic to share under your tag. I didn't have the time to seek someone out to see if it was okay due to kids and school today.

I'll be adding at least two more posts to those tags. One of them involves people being executed who were later found either innocent or there existed evidence to cast doubt on their guilt. The other involves Thorium use.


Posted via proofofbrain.io

Yes, please feel free to add #informationwar tag to any posts that align with the topics in this post. https://hive.blog/@informationwar/about-the-decentralized-truth-movement-and-informationwar

Do you have a link to the discord channel your purpose mentions?


Posted via proofofbrain.io

Sure thing, here's all our info.

Manually curated for #informationwar (by @truthforce)

  • Our purpose is to encourage posts discussing Information War, Propaganda, Disinformation, and Liberty. We are a peaceful and non-violent movement that sees information as being held back by corrupt forces in the private sector and government. Our Mission.
  • Discord, website, youtube channel links here.

Delegate to the @informationwar! project and get rewarded

Thank you very much

Wow. I had no clue. Almost every single STEM, environment, and true crime post I've made could fall into this category. Amazing. Thanks for sharing the link.


Posted via proofofbrain.io

Congratulations @scholaris! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

You distributed more than 47000 upvotes.
Your next target is to reach 48000 upvotes.

You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

Check out the last post from @hivebuzz:

False-Positive phishing alert reported by antivirus software
Feedback from the May 1st Hive Power Up Day
Support the HiveBuzz project. Vote for our proposal!

I know not why people do evil.

There could be many reasons, including abuse in their childhoods. I saw the saying that God already forgiven everyone for their bad/evil things. I hope that is true, because I also did some (very) bad, dark evil things in my life.
I received a lot of hate during my childhood, both from my father and my schoolmates/classmates. I was a very emotional person as a child, but the above mentioned things made me evil on some degree.

I forgiven all of the above, hopefully everyone else (including God) forgive me.

Nowadays the world (at least this world) is full of evil things and doings.

Many people have bad lives, which they do not deserve.

I really hope that God will forgive and help both this world and me.

I think the most important reason is that we feel whether or not something evil occurs. Knowledge about the world around us also plays a significant part in this regard. We can't know something is wrong if we're raised to believe nothing is wrong with what we do.