So me explaining the technicality of law, is me condoning the law? Condoning Stalinism? Condoning crimes of USSR? Must be because there is absolutely no other reason to ask me such insipid nonsense than to try and suggest that I'm condoning what I'm Explaining.
Do you know what a complex question fallacy is?
Its when you ask a question that implicates me as morally or otherwise less then, by posing as a simple yes or no question, where saying no or yes I'm tacitly agreeing to the question's false premise.
https://www.thoughtco.com/complex-question-fallacy-1689890
So what fact are you accusing me of ignoring here?
stalinism killed ordinary people throughout the soviet era, not just during World War II. but you will also ignore this fact and say that all those killed were nazis, right?
What other fact, besides this ridiculous one, are you accusing me of also ignoring with you pretext?
You yourself are trying to confuse me in everything.
You write
And I explain to you what was said about stalinism in general, which killed people even after the war. and communism did not live well. you obviously do not know about the shortage of goods, lack of toilet paper, appliances, queues for a simple TV, the inability to buy a car
Don't you think that I also have grandmothers who lived in the USSR? satisfied there were only those who were relatives of high-ranking officials, ordinary people were not satisfied.
Should I trust other people's grandmothers, not my own, right?
My grandmothers are also Nazis?
And why don't you want to listen to what my relatives who lived there say? They are not people or what?
And why don't you shuffle and just blame Ukraine for everything? Start with yourself!
You don't believe anything I write about. So why are you here? Just write your own?
And where is your skepticism and doubts about what is happening in Ukraine?