How is this the first time you come forward to comment on the matter? Where were you 2 weeks ago and can you decide on stopping this scheme so I can continue not caring about what you guys are up to?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
How is this the first time you come forward to comment on the matter? Where were you 2 weeks ago and can you decide on stopping this scheme so I can continue not caring about what you guys are up to?
Hi @acidyo,
https://hive.blog/delegation/@hive.curation/delegate-your-hp-and-get-20-times-upvote-daily-equivalent-apr-up-to-26-or-apr-16-return-day-331
How come this is not vote-selling?
It is difficult for me to understand this. Looking for a layman's explanation.
Thanks
Looks like it is.
Thanks!
Is this request wrong?
Shadow Hunters
https://ecency.com/hive-179017/@thesobuz/entry-for-the-reflection-hunters-a9b871c151b5c
https://ecency.com/hive-179017/@annephilbrick/reflection-hunters-contest-winners-round-15
I highly doubt that small community is focusing on only curating posts that are giving them beneficiary and even go so far as to look for posts 12h before payout just to cheat themselves some more self-votes with 1-1.5m HP. Using beneficiaries if you want to aid a community is fine as long as the self-votes don't mainly focus on that for themselves.
It is, but if had to choose between downvoting a 50% and that account that spreads out their votes on other authors, I'd choose the former as it does a lesser evil.
I have seen that account upvote authors not delegated to it so it's curation pattern is not entirely aimed at circle jerking per se.
Unlike a project hope scheme where there is a small to zero chance one can get an upvote if they don't set 50% beneficiaries to their post.
Firstly!
I don't use foul words and neither I wish to continue to have a conversation if you will use such slang.
I am a newcomer on Hive and this is my first hand experience of this platform and if this is how the top guns gives explanation, what to say.
Secondly, the "lesser evil" does not make any sense. Evil is evil, less or more. The thing which is "less" for you, can be "more" for me. It is very subjective.
Could you do me a favour by going through these too, especially towards the end.
https://ecency.com/hive-106444/@nelinoeva/feathered-friends-show-me-a-photo-contest-round-18
https://ecency.com/hive-174695/@justclickindiva/family-day-at-the-castle-or-lets-make-a-collage-round-79
Just trying to understand the platform.
You can take offense about the slang as much as you want, it is what it is. Would you prefer me to use some euphemism like cooperative alternative monetary masturbation on the blockchain? No slang there.
The 1st link implies that it's not mandatory to set those beneficiaries and even people that don't set it gets a vote. Project hope seems to favor posts that 50% beneficiary rewards as a prerequisite.
People are encourage but they are not punished for not doing it with being ignored.
The second link is a requirement for a contest. Note the contest guidelines as submitting something not within the usual content you would see as there are specific requirements for entry.
Second part, you're right evil is evil and I would love to have more dv mana to get as much rewards reduced for people that do cooperative alternative monetary masturbation on the blockchain.
I find it funny that a member from the PH community brought this other unfair scheme to light to me and at the same time @crypto.piotr uses our attempt to make it stop as me attacking yet another "community". You guys are hilarious at this point.
@acidyo, overthinking kills.
I asked those questions to get an explanation of the vote-selling. I didn't anticipate that you would be writing a post on it leave apart who is commenting and who is not.
When I didn't get a satisfactory explanation of "how setting a beneficiary is vote-selling ", I started looking at other communities that are asking members to set beneficiary. And then I shared all those with you to get an explanation.
This was the reason why I shared it with you, it is not the way you think it is.
It is quite hilarious the way you are imagining it to be.
I am new to this platform and it is out of curiosity that I am asking these questions, not for any ill gains.
Apart from a member of PH, I also have also created my own community ( https://hive.blog/trending/hive-123740), I was asking questions for more clarity.
And this is not the first time I have asked questions, I have done so in community incubation and ocd discord.
Thanks
lol the way you guys have been overthinking all the reasons in the world I may be downvoting you instead of just facing the facts is also quite hilarious
Why the hell should we please you in your desires for domination and censorship?
Why are you surprised that he didn't write to you before?
Maybe that was going to change your position towards us?
ps: my verb was perfectly used. I did not want to use another more specific word.
You're censoring yourself more by pretending to be nice and professional people than any downvotes ever did. I don't feel like censoring myself when I want to call out dickheads like you for what I truly feel you are. A disgrace who post garbage spun content just with the rewards in mind and now you feel you want to cheat your way to more by using schemes and trick your whole cultlike community to do the same on the premise that there will be more rewards in the future while throwing some examples of philanthropy in the mix as a defensive shield. Some people may be easily tricked and not see you for what you really are but not everyone and thankfully those who do have a say in the matter and some weight behind them. At this point even if you do seize this scheme I might just focus my downvote curation a bit more on the garbage you call content that's easily found on many other places on the internet for free.
Why do you strive to explain your thoughts? Do you think I care about it? At all not!
A couple of weeks ago you said you were going to mute me, you did not.
You need to keep seeing what I do and I say. Maybe you can not fulfill your own promise?
You're the one who mentioned me, fuckface.
Jajajajajaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa lol!!!!
not as lol as your past activity on the chain with your underaged daughter.
You're the best!
Censorship? It's about the rewards you're bitching about. You have been posting on the platform for years and you cry censorship over the downvotes?
Try doing away with the 50% leeching propaganda.