So, do I read that right when I say it takes ~350mv to reach linear?
And anybody with ~400mv+ gets a bonus to how much influence their vests have on the distribution of the pool?
When the top curator is raking in 16x the top author, we might want to look at any influence bonuses they may be getting?
I have never been happy with this curve because it punishes the poor and gives a bonus to the rich, but if it impacts less than what is taken out by our infamous selfvoted circle jerks, it may not be worth the effort to get overturned.
If I said, 'Delegating for profit is wholesale selling of votes.', where would your support lie?
We forked out vote selling, wth is with this blind spot?
That one curator has 10M or so stake highly optimized.
It doesn’t punish the poor. Voting is a community effort. Outside of solo votes on comments, even tiny votes are lumped into many other votes and the curve no longer affects it in a negative manor.
There is a similar benefit to all voters big or small as it benefits popular content not rich people.
What you are saying is only true in a vacuum where a users vote is alone.
A lot, but it's hard to tell as not all of the abuse moved to Hive.
So, do I read that right when I say it takes ~350mv to reach linear?
And anybody with ~400mv+ gets a bonus to how much influence their vests have on the distribution of the pool?
When the top curator is raking in 16x the top author, we might want to look at any influence bonuses they may be getting?
I have never been happy with this curve because it punishes the poor and gives a bonus to the rich, but if it impacts less than what is taken out by our infamous selfvoted circle jerks, it may not be worth the effort to get overturned.
If I said, 'Delegating for profit is wholesale selling of votes.', where would your support lie?
We forked out vote selling, wth is with this blind spot?
That one curator has 10M or so stake highly optimized.
It doesn’t punish the poor. Voting is a community effort. Outside of solo votes on comments, even tiny votes are lumped into many other votes and the curve no longer affects it in a negative manor.
There is a similar benefit to all voters big or small as it benefits popular content not rich people.
What you are saying is only true in a vacuum where a users vote is alone.