You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Only 2 out the top 10 posts on trending aren't about Hive or LEO - GIVE ME MORE DIVERSIFIED CONTENT PLEASE!

in LeoFinance4 years ago (edited)

You make fair points, except for my post which of course is awesome. Cause its mine.

To share some thoughts on my curation. I try my best to curate everybody posting through the interface. But I take various things under consideration, other than just post quality. Let's take @forexbrokr for example. His posts aren't the best! BUT he is doing some serious work, promoting leofinance on twitter and quora and other shit. That's why I usually give him higher votes compared to other people making "better" posts. Same applies to people that post non hive/leo stuff, usually I give them higher votes, especially if the don't post everyday, like @beehivetrader. Unfortunately, the problem with spreading my votes thin is that I rarely give somebody a good push. But I think with time, as the wealth is spread more and more this will fix itself. Also I generally avoid upvoting at all people that have a big stake. At all. Cause if leo becomes a succeed they and I will be rich anyways.

Being a whale means that people vote me, regardless of quality, hoping I will vote them in return and they gain my favor or whatever. To an extent, that's true (because they get an extra chance to get noticed by me) but generally I don't give a shit. Unfortunately, that's an inherent problem with PoS and I can't think of a way to solve it. Other than not posting. Call me greedy, but I think I deserve one self vote on my posts a day.

In the meantime I will keep doing what I do. Shitposting, spreading the wealth, shill leo everywhere I can and onboard as many users as I can. This is how I have fun here :)

Let's pamp it!

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

Sort:  

My post frequency went a bit down TBH, because of a project I'm working on... :(
Good point here, worth considering....
When I first joined Hive, I thought of solving the PoS problem you mentioned, but unfortunately most of them were not feasible enough...
It somewhat meant a complete change in the existing protocol, conflict of interest and all, which may even result in a community split, hardfork, chain split and stuff (whatever, maybe), so I personally feel there should be some other solution to avoid those issues... LEt's see, maybe we all can brainstorm on this sometime :)

That's an interesting trail of upvotes ?!?! 😂

But I think with time, as the wealth is spread more and more this will fix itself.

Actually, it already has to a point. A full vote from me used to be worth over 30 leo.I keep powering up, yet yesterday it was only 23 ;)

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

And one final point, length isn't necessarily better. I doubt there are many people on leo atm that can deliver the content @forexbrokr does, long or short. Apologies for going a bit off topic.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

His posts aren't the best!

They are the best.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

I actually quite like your strategy, it's blunt but effective!

Hopefully that post didn't come across as too critical of you, i just reported on what I saw in that snap shot of time!

You're a LEO legend, also responsible for one of the best initiatives IMO - the shitty investment challenge, that was a great one!

Top Marks for your work on Blurt too btw!

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

haha, don't worry. I even learned some french!!!!

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta