Let's dismantle the virus organism lie once and for all!

in Dare To Think2 years ago (edited)

img_0.8194732899809446.jpg

Has anyone ever read the John Enders paper that was supposedly the gold standard of virology to prove virus organisms existed?

img_0.666965097546941.jpg

img_0.3410660604636724.jpg
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.3181/00379727-86-21073

So here he is saying the control experiment he used that did not contain a sample from a sick person with so-called measles virus also produced or grew the measles virus organism by claiming cytopathic effect only.🤣🤣

So what virologists claim is they need to seed cell cultures with the fluid of sick people to find the virus in the cell cultures by pointing to a cytopathic effect rather than an isolated virus organism.

This virologist disproved that theory completely when he caused a cytopathic effect by growing the measles virus inside cells that was never seeded with a sample of a sick person claimed to have measles. 🤣

This guy John Enders got awarded the Nobel Prize for this but instead of disproving virus theory they claimed he proved it 100% 🤣🤣🤣

Not only did the control produce the same cytopathic effect and particles he then decided to stain these cells to try and distinguish the cytopathic effect and particles from the cell culture that did have the human sample in it.

So because the stain changed the look of that cell and showed nuclear changes different from the culture with the human sample, this meant the measles virus organism and cytopathic effect that was once indistinguishable was now distinguishable from the control virus organism. 🤣🤣🤣

He says without staining the cell culture particles in the 2 separate cell cultures both produced measles cytopathic viruses that were indistinguishable even though the control was never seeded with a human sample. 🤦‍♂️

Staining and adding chemicals to a bunch of cells is not isolation, it is the complete opposite! Messing around with cells claiming they are growing the virus instead of actually purifying the virus is not a real isolation process either.

To isolate something one must take away and separate from all other things. This cell culture process is the opposite and relies on adding more and more things to be added in order to claim to have found a single isolated thing. 🤣🤣🤣

Can you believe this pseudoscience process of isolation relies on adding more and more stuff, rather than taking away things?

This process ignores the scientific method completely and somehow passed for actual science and won a nobel prize?🤣

So because he noticed a different reaction when he stained the control set of cells, that is his 100% proof that the stained cells were not producing measles virus organisms even though they were indistinguishable from measles virus organisms before adding the stain. 🤣🤦‍♂️

He then says when others are doing this process they should not jump to conclusions when claiming they find specific virus organisms cytopathic effect as it could just be from the cell culture process using monkey kidney cells and that you may need to stain it to change it. 🤣🤣🤣

Welcome to the world of fakebelieve virology pseudoscience!🤣🤣🤣

img_0.6931547997256329.jpg

img_0.5475217310573791.jpg
https://www.thecrimson.com/article/1954/11/19/enders-states-measles-virus-now-isolated/

In another article interviewing the same guy he says he was also able to assume he isolated and found the measles virus for the first time ever by claiming the virus was reacting to specific measles antibodies that are known to be specific to measles virus organisms, but I must point out that he had not yet isolated or found the measles virus so how could he know that the antibodies are specific to the measles virus? 🤣🤣🤣

This reminds me of the chicken and the egg dilemma if you believe antibodies are specific to virus organisms. How do you know the antibodies are measles antibodies before you even isolate the measles virus?

20220607_100239.jpg

Virology is a pure retardation of science and biology.

20220607_105216.jpg

After reading the highlights above and his own conclusion, are you convinced 100% that John Enders found the one and only measles virus organism that causes measles?

Update:
The more I think about it the more problems I find.

Such as the cell culture that he says contains measles virus before isolation of a measles virus 🤣 when he stains these cells they would definitely have different nuclear changes and produce larger cells because of the human genetic material that he added to the culture, duh…. This has nothing to do with finding virus organisms.

He is claiming he knows 100% that the human sample has the measles virus inside it without any confirmation beforehand. 🤦‍♂️

And staining a cell culture with added human DNA in it would obviously have different nuclear changes as he is staining human cells not just monkey kidney cells.

Virus Isolation, truly is junk science.

Sort:  

Thanks for the update at the end. It's very hard to isolate particles that are too small to view with light. It seems that there has been a rush to judgement in these articles. Did they ever finish their proof after receiving the Nobel Prize?

Not as far as I know, virology is just junk science that mainstream institutions now teach and support.

Congratulations @shanhenry! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s):

You distributed more than 7000 upvotes.
Your next target is to reach 8000 upvotes.

You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

Support the HiveBuzz project. Vote for our proposal!