RE: No vaccine will be a silver bullet against all mutations. And as the n ...

[chrisrice]

Umm, distrusting "science" is the wrong way to word it.

1. Science is NOT a list of truths, it's the practice of experimenting & observing the results

2. If someome tells you what to believe & you believe it since they said it was "science", believing it is NOT science.
   
   Posted via D.Buzz

Comments

[discernente]

Science is not the opinion of somebody or even an individual scientist. Science is the scientific consensus.

[chrisrice]

Umm its not the consensus, it's a method for testing & observing results

1. https://www.britannica.com/science/scientific-method

2. Part of the scientific method is questioning the consensus

3. If you blindly accept whatever the consensus is, you are not being scientific
   
   Posted via D.Buzz

[discernente]

The consensus is formed using the method. If using the method you cannot contradict the consensus, it gets stronger. The consensus is the culmination, the apex of the method.

[chrisrice]

Umm, the consensus doesn't always get stronger, sometimes it breaks and scientists discover the consensus was WRONG.

• One of the best acheivements for a scientist is proving the consensus wrong!
  
  Posted via D.Buzz

[discernente]

It is very rare to a scientific consensus be contradicted. Normally they are just perfected. My advice is to not be on the wrong side. Specially when you are distrusting a scientific consensus to follow internet conspiracy theory. It is definitely not something very smart to do.

[chrisrice]

Umm, well

1. There's a scientific consenses AND

2. There's a Government & #BigTech consensus where no discussion is allowed & anyone that disagrees w/Dr. Fauci is censored off the net, ridiculed, shamed & in the case of well respected scientists, not given air time
   
   Posted via D.Buzz

[chrisrice]

The "consensus" a.k.a. mainstream narrative of #Covid19 is political/propaganda

Similar to the #WarOnTerror used to invade Middle Eastern countries

• Are you aware that both #Stalin & #Hitler were talked about highly in the US #mainstream media?
  
  Posted via D.Buzz

[chrisrice]

Oh wait, I see what you mean, I misread it at first.

• Yeah you are right.

But there is a lot of people and scientists who contradicted the "Consensus", they are being censored though, and some of them are from Universities, reputable Hospitals, etc.

Posted via D.Buzz

[discernente]

They are not censored, they are refuted using the scientific method. Take for example the intelligent design, the "scientists" that defended it were not censored but completely refuted.

[chrisrice]

Umm no, check my @dbuzz Profile

1. I posted a video of an interview w/ Cartherine Fitts, a former banker & US official who points out that 34 of the 37 towns with riots, had a Federal Reserve bank
   https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catherine_Austin_Fitts

It got censored


Posted via D.Buzz

[discernente]

What it has to do with science? She is not even a scientist.

[chrisrice]

If you haven't seen respected doctors, researchers & scientists who call mask wearing completely ineffective (in most cases) & unnecessary..

Get censored from the net, you must only tune into the programming of #Mainstream #Media

That video I posted fot deleted w/12 hours

Posted via D.Buzz

[discernente]

Science has nothing to do with individual opinions, but with the consensus. Science is not opinion, it has methods and criteria to follow until it gets to its final conclusions.

[chrisrice]

But btw, I appreciate communicating with you . . These are just my views 😊

Posted via D.Buzz