Sort:  

I'm not sure there's a detectable distinction when coercion is involved.

Most people think it's "wrong" to "break the law" (even when there is no moral justification for a particular law).

So, whoever can effectively control the text of the law (and the enforcement mechanism) de facto creates "right" and "wrong" out of thin air.

I'm not sure there's a detectable distinction when coercion is involved.

Effectively, yes.
Objectively, no.

As long as force is a factor there is no right and wrong, only a struggle for survival.

Well stated.