Without the tweets, the multi-million dollar company won't give a shit. The companies evaluate the community's potential based on the buzz created. Or will a multi-million dollar company list a coin if only a selected group use it?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Do you have any facts to support this opinion?
Does the 'buzz' have to pass a certain decibel level?
Yes because buzz is a strong determinant of the value of most entities these days. Especially if there's a positive sentiment around the internet. Here's an academic publication to back my first statement
Research gate
Well, considering Hive doesn't have a marketing department, and that we're Decentralised, it is our collective responsibility to promote/shill the platform. We all made loud enough noise to make John McAfee, cointelegraph and numerous reputable outlets talk about us. Or do you want to say that all those events were also coordinated by the select few?
Don't get me wrong, I'm taking nothing away from input but as a community, we all work to our collective capacities and with our resources. If certain members ask to be paid for their services from the community fund for that, then I don't get where we're going.
Yes. Binance and Huobi backing down. Binance issuing a statement over major influencers picking up the story like McAfee, Vitalik, The greek Bitcoin guy. Not a single thing would happen without the community outcry.
There are metrics that are taken into account, yes.
If youre refering to "decibels" as loudness of sound then decibels are irelevant in the case of typing words over the internet.