tl;dr
You have some support, but probably not enough to overcome the forces against. If your account name is tainted, make a new one
========
This is an important point. The stake from your account was used in an attack. Just from the chain record, we have no idea of knowing who was ignorant of the proxied actions or who supported them
These will probably have to come up as individual proposals, and I would support anyone acknowledging they understand what happened: their stake was used in an attack because they trusted a proxy that did not deserve the trust
To be clear - my stake is tiny and probably wouldn't help those proposals. I'm honestly not sure the support would be there, but it would be sensible
The understanding is the critical piece. We'd have to at least be able to make a judgment call about the likelihood of that stake resuming the attack
As far as your name being tainted - I wouldn't sweat it. The consequence of losing in politics (getting everything downvoted) in DPoS is tumbling your stake through an exchange and into another account
I'll keep an eye out for individual proposals. They'd get some support. Sorry things went that way for you. It's lame