I agree, except for:
So a better analogy might be:
-Better- = your opinion
Mine story was an efficient summary. The rest is pointless to whether or not 'Anarchy' is "possible/exists", but can be fun to point out anyways I guess. Much like the 10 commandments and how you can basically just boil them down to '..do unto others...'.
You explained why Anarchy cannot be, or always is, nicely. If you start anarchy it is just a temporary state of perception which results in, the end of anarchy, or as you put it, the 'acceptance' that we 'are'(essentially) anarchy.
Are all these folks chasing what they already have?
Not chasing, trying to assert maybe?