Hybrid War Waged On the People

in #informationwar10 months ago

Hybrid war is being waged upon the people by the State and COVID 19 is the casus belli. The objective is to use misinformation and disinformation to promote widespread behaviour change. The behaviour change is required to create the economic, social, political and cultural condition for the globalist's Great Reset. As defined by the World Economic Forum (WEF).

The UK government are one of many so called western democracies who are collaborating with the WEF to bring about the Great Reset. In the UK, Prime Minister Boris Johnson borrowed the United Nation's slogan of "Build Back Better" (favoured by Jo Biden in the U.S.) to cover up the apparent fact that his policies come from another globalist organisation, the Wold Economic Forum. In his recent conference speech, he said:

After all we have been through it isn’t enough just to go back to normal.....We have been through too much......to think that life can go on as it was before the plague. [COVID 19 is]....the trigger for an acceleration of social and economic change......That is why this government will build back better.....We must be clear that there comes a moment when the state must stand back and let the private sector get on with it......This government has been forced by the pandemic into erosions of liberty that we deeply regret, and to an expansion of the role of the state....we accept [this] _because there is simply no reasonable alternative.

[paraphrase added]

As many have warned, there will be no return to the life we once knew. The new abnormal is permanent. The "we," who accept this, refers to the acolytes of the Great Reset and COVID 19 is nowhere near being a disease of plague like proportions.

From the outset, there have been many alternatives to the draconian lockdown policies deployed by the State. However, for those who seek to further consolidate their power and control, COVID 19 is not a problem but an opportunity. Medical science and objective reasoning will not interfere in their plans to make the most of it.

Despite more than 4000 scientists and 7000 medical professionals signing the Great Barrington Declaration, urging the government to end its lethal lockdown policies, the UK government dismissed it out of hand. They claimed this group of thousands of scientists and doctors only have assumptions to back up their qualified opinions.

The UK government chose instead to stick with their own, tiny band of handpicked scientific advisors, whose judgements and decisions have, to date, been based upon nothing but assumptions. All of which have turned out to be either wildly inaccurate or simply wrong.

With Johnson's words we see what the Great Reset is really all about. Like Mussolini's fascist state, the Great Reset is a public-private partnership. It simply reverses the dominant order of il Duce's fascismo.

Instead of the political hierarchy controlling the business of corporations, in the Great Reset (the new Build Back Better abnormal), the corporations dominate political decision making. Policies and strategy comes from the board rooms and private think tanks, the governments role is merely to implement them.

During the same conference, UK Chancellor Rishi Sunak made it quite clear how political power will be exploited. He stated:

(

What began in March as a health emergency has grown and now reaches deep into our economy and society.....it has been for many, for the first time in their lives, a moment in which government ceased to be distant and abstract, but became real, and felt.....We are now seeing our economy go through changes as a result of coronavirus that can’t be ignored.....I have always said I couldn’t protect every job or every business.....the overwhelming might of the British state will be placed at your service.

The people feel the overwhelming might of the State because it has used its farcical political authority to establish a legislative and regulatory cage for the population. A prison to protect the interests of the multinational oligarchy who control it.

"Build Back Better" (the Great Reset) has a price tag, but only for us, the ordinary folk: Individual liberties permanently lost and inalienable rights ignored, replaced with biosecurity obligations, reward for compliance and punishment for dissent; our ability to travel, work, conduct business, access vital services, and even purchase the item we need, centrally monitored and controlled, via our "immunity status," in the new abnormal State.

 

The Fourth Industrial Revolution Partnership

 
The UK Government are WEF partners on a number of initiatives. For example, the global corporations forming the WEF are at the heart of the UK government's drive towards AI led procurement programs. Similarly, The UK's regulatory framework for their entire industrial strategy is a collaboration between the UK Government and the WEF Centre for the Fourth Industrial Revolution.

The Fourth Industrial Revolution (FIR) was a term first coined by Klaus Schwab, co-founder and current executive chairman of the WEF. Like previous technological epochs, its combined set of emergent technologies can be used for good or ill. The technology itself isn't necessarily the problem, but how it is being controlled and deployed is.

The FIR promises to decentralise production and localise supply chains, it offers the possibility of a decentralised monetary system and the creation of a network of autonomous communities cooperating in spontaneous order. However, it also enables the centralisation of all authority and mass surveillance of the individual; the establishment of a worldwide biosecurity State, an energy rationed global governance system and a unified international realpolitik that denies freedom.

When Schwab first wrote of the FIR, he highlighted both its potential and its risks. While he appeared to advocate an empowering distribution of technology, for the benefit of all humanity, he also spelled out a darker possibility.

Governments will gain new technological powers to increase their control over populations, based on pervasive surveillance systems and the ability to control digital infrastructure....The Fourth Industrial Revolution will also profoundly impact the nature of national and international security......Modern conflicts involving states are increasingly “hybrid” in nature......The distinction between war and peace, combatant and noncombatant, and even violence and nonviolence (think cyberwarfare) is becoming uncomfortably blurry....The tracking and sharing of information about us is a crucial part of the new connectivity.

There is no doubt that the FIR is underway, so the question is which model are we being forced to accept? Are we about to witness the global decentralisation of everything, from the means of production to the currency we use, or are we being corralled into the nightmare hinted at by Schwab?

A world of distant global governance. A technocracy, centrally administered by carefully selected "stakeholders?"

 

The COVID 19 Opportunity

 
The UK government's collaboration with the WEF led to their policy paper Regulation For The Fourth Industrial Revolution. This indicates which model of the FIR the UK government favours.

We have established a partnership with the World Economic Forum to shape the global governance of technological innovation."_The centralised, global control of technological innovation is practically an oxymoron. Unless your intention is to stifle real innovation and seize control of research and development for your own benefit.

COVID 19 is viewed by the WEF, and its globalist partners like the UK government, as a fantastic opportunity. They clearly articulate this:

There is an urgent need for global stakeholders to cooperate in simultaneously managing the direct consequences of the COVID-19 crisis......The Covid-19 crisis......is fundamentally changing the traditional context for decision-making. The inconsistencies, inadequacies and contradictions of multiple systems.....are more exposed than ever amidst a global context....As we enter a unique window of opportunity to shape the recovery, this initiative will offer insights to help inform all those determining the future state of global relations...Drawing from the vision and vast expertise of the leaders engaged across the Forum’s communities, the Great Reset initiative has a set of dimensions to build a new social contract.

The World Health Organisation declared a global COVID 19 pandemic on 11th of March and the WEF had their extensive COVID Action Platform up and running on the 12th. The WEF stated it was their intention to order the future state of international relations, the direction of national economies, the priorities of societies, the nature of business models and the management of a global commons (control of all resources).

According to the WEF, COVID 19 improves the chances of them controlling_ global relations._ Multiple systems of governance are rubbish and a single, centralised technocracy of stakeholders is essential. Apparently, when a tiny handful of oligarchs have total dominion over the Earth's resources, we will all be much better off.

The fundamental change to the traditional context for decision-making is simply unavoidable and means we all have to accept a new social contract. Policy will be determined by WEF approved leaders who will control all of us because they have vision and vast expertise.

As we all know, great leaders with vision and vast expertise are pretty thin on the ground. Instead we have the likes of Richard Haass, Christine Lagarde, Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab and Prince Charles. Only their ambition is vast, and this is reflected in the objectives shared by WEF corporate partners and the governments they collaborate with.

If you think there is a distinct lack of democratic oversight in this "plan," you are right. Obviously, no sane individual would ever knowingly submit to this tyrannical, jackboot, lunacy. So we need to be convinced that the Great Reset power grab is essential.

Fear is a great motivator and COVID 19 is perfect for instilling some in the population. As long as we are scared into believing our governments only wants to "protect us" and "keep us safe," there is a reasonable prospect many of us will fall for this tripe. This is where hybrid warfare comes in handy.

 

The Hybrid War Protagonists

 
In hybrid warfare there is no distinction between war and peace. The battlefield is everything and everywhere simultaneously. The enemy is whoever stands in the way of your objectives. Especially people who openly disagree with government policy and journalists who stray off script.

Formerly the Security Assistance Group (an amalgam of the Media Operations Group, 15 Psychological Operations Group, Security Capacity Building Team, and the Military Stabilisation and Support Group), the 77th Brigade of the British Army specialises in information warfare (surveillance and propaganda). They state that their objective is to adapt behaviours of adversaries and describe themselves as an agent of change.

The Brigades works with the UK Cabinet Office's Rapid Response Unit (RRU). In a 2018 article The Director of Government Communications, Alex Aiken, explained how the domestic hybrid war was led by the RRU:

It (the RRU) monitors news and information being shared and engaged with online to identify emerging issues.....The unit’s round the clock monitoring service has identified several stories of concern.....The unit has tackled misinformation closer to home.....a number of articles from US and UK outlets...... quickly spread via social media, which was then spotted by RRU monitoring......The unit activated social media content which helped to rebalance the narrative.

In his 2018 article, Aiken also revealed the States partnership with the Big Tech' corporations. He wrote: >"The unit (RRU) identified that a number of false narratives from alternative news sources were gaining traction online. These “alt-news” sources are biased....When people searched for information....unreliable sources were appearing above official UK government information....no government information was appearing on the first 15 pages of Google results......The RRU improved the ranking from below 200 to number 1 within a matter of hours."

The "alt-news" sources are biased because they question power and government policy. Like the mainstream media used to do.

Anyone who has ever worked in Search Engine Optimisation (SEO) knows that even the WPP Group would struggle to take a web page’s organic Google search ranking from below 200 to number 1 in a few hours. Aiken ostensibly confirmed that the UK Government works with Google to fix the search results.

For politically sensitive topics, Google doesn't appear to be a genuine search engine at all. For these search results, it acts more like a State propaganda website. like the UK government, Google are among the many technology corporations partnering with the WEF in their Great Reset.

We shouldn't doubt the government's commitment to hybrid war. The British Chief of Defence Staff Sir Nick Carter, speaking to the Royal United Services Institute in 2018, stated:

Since 2016 we have seen a marked shift to..[a]..sophisticated use of smear campaigns and fake news...[it] _has to be defeated....One has to recognise the importance of messaging....I’ve been very impressed with the talent that’s come forward to join the Army Reserve....we have got some remarkable talent when it comes to social media.... I think it’s important that we build on the excellent foundation we’ve created for Information Warfare through our 77 Brigade.

[paraphrase added]

Sharing a platform with the former Director of the CIA, precisely echoing the words of Klaus Schwab, in September 2019, Carter told the Cliveden set:

The changing character of warfare has exposed the distinctions that don’t exist any longer between peace and war….I feel I am now at war.....because great power competition and the battle of ideas with non-state actors is threatening us on a daily basis…….The character of warfare is evolving…..Information is going to be at the core of so much that we do. Future warfare is going to be very much information-centric.

Again, General Carter, speaking on the 22nd of April this year, stated how the British Army had been tasked by the government (essentially to promote the WEF's policy agenda). He told the gathered press:

We have been involved with the Cabinet Office rapid response unit, with our 77 Brigade helping to quash rumours from misinformation, but also to counter disinformation.

77th Brigades role in the COVID 19 hybrid war was outlined thanks to a parliamentary question asked by DUP MP Gavin Robinson. Armed Forces Minister James Heappey responded:

A team from the Ministry of Defence, including members of the Army's 77th Brigade, is currently supporting the UK Government's Rapid Response Unit in the Cabinet Office and are working to counter dis/misinformation about COVID-19.

The RRU proudly announced that they have rebutted 70 false claims per week concerning COVID 19. The "other agents" they refer to, as part of their counter disinformation unit, include 77th Brigade and its army of social media troops determined to shape our behaviours.

With senior executives of social media networks recruited to its ranks, there is no doubt that 77th Brigade is busy on social media, actively engaged in information war.

77th Brigade are also well represented in the UK Parliament. Mark Lancaster (Armed Forces Minister) was, until recently, their Deputy Commander and the chair of the House of Commons defence committee, Tobias Ellwood, is a serving 77th Brigade Lieutenant Colonel.

We can't be certain in what capacity some MP's are making statements to Parliament. For example, Tobias Ellwood made a statement to the house on 29th September in which he advocated that the military and Ministry of Defence (MOD) should take the lead on the mass distribution of a COVID 19 vaccine.

A vaccine which is both unregulated and for which the manufactures have no liability at all. Of course, Astrazeneca, GSK (via the Wellcome Trust), Gilead Sciences, Novartis, Pfizer and Sanofi etc. are all WEF partners in the Great Reset.

Was Ellwood speaking as an MP, representing his constituents, or as a serving military propagandist promoting the Great Reset? We just don't know.

77th Brigade are fighting their information war alongside others such as the open information partnership. Their efforts are part of a wider push to control our behaviour.

A network of well funded, self appointed anti hate campaigners and Big Tech's fact checking partners are collaborating with governments and supranational governmental organisations to control public access to information. Wide ranging censorship legislation is also proposed to form a comprehensive public-private censorship grid.

 

Who Are The Enemy?

 
In this war "non state actors" defines everyone as the enemy. This includes terrorist organisations and extremist groups, who probably are dangerous. However, it also identifies you and your family as potential national security threats.

No distinction is made between peace and war. We all need to understand this. Everyone is a possible target.

As WEF collaborators, the UK government is intent upon giving itself carte blanche to commit crime in pursuit of shared goals. The Covert Human Intelligence (Criminal Conduct) Bill proposes to allow government agencies, and their operatives, to perpetrate any crime (as none are currently specified in the Bill) with impunity. It "legalises" the unfettered use of criminality by the State, without restrictions of any kind.

If it passes into law, the military (77th Brigade included) will have the legal authority to engage in criminal activity to "keep us safe." Providing they believe we are some sort of loosely defined threat to national security, are committing or likely to commit a crime (Online Harms legislation pending) or threaten the economic wellbeing of the UK (whatever that means), criminal acts perpetrated against us are fine.

We can't expect elected representatives to do anything about this. Most of them blindly follow the party whips and the dissenting voices are a tiny minority.

Thus far there has been no meaningful parliamentary opposition to the Covert Human Intelligence (Criminal Conduct) Bill. It sailed through it's second reading. Hundreds of so called opposition MP's couldn't even be bothered to show up.

We are required to run for the safety of the Great Reset dictatorship. Consequently, questions are not welcome. Those who openly raise doubts about what we are told by government, and its mainstream media partners, will only encourage others to explore their own misgivings. This will not be tolerated.

Therefore, any expressed opinion not "on message" is labeled as disinformation, because disinformation is whatever the biosecurity State says it is. The State determines the official truth.

Any who challenge it, regardless of the evidence they present, will be viable prey for the hybrid warriors. Just as Orwell warned.

Those who reject the COVID 19 fear porn, who highlight scientific doubt, statistical anomalies, medical scepticism, or indeed say or share anything which runs contrary to the official State COVID 19 narrative, are to be marginalised, publicly ridiculed and silenced by any means necessary. Criminal or otherwise.

If COVID 19 ever was a population level threat, it isn't the most pressing any longer. The people are under attack by their own State. All the necessary components of a fascist technocracy are rapidly being assembled.

Make no mistake, in the hybrid information war, we are the enemy._

~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~

 
Take it easy you hoopy froods.
 
Follow In this Together

Hive

Twitter

Steemit

PocketNet

FLOTE

Minds

~~~~~~~~ Watch In This Together ~~~~~~~~*

LBRY

Bitchute

YouTube

3Speak

~~~~~~~~ Recommended Websites ~~~~~~~~*

In This Together

The Corbett Report

the UK Column

the OffGuardian

21st Century Wire

Richplanet

Global Research

The UK & Ireland Database

Sort:  

Spot on thank you.

YEP.

@tipu curate

Policies and strategy comes from the board rooms and private think tanks, the governments role is merely to implement them.

Perhaps Anarchy already exists and "the government" is merely the highest manifestation of organized crime.

Perhaps Anarchy already exists and "the government" is merely the highest manifestation of organized crime.

Yes. This is precisely my argument against anarchists. And why I tell the story:
"Once upon a time, there was anarchy, then, there was not" -The End

Anarchy is spontaneous order and society is built upon it. No State compels the farmer to grow carrots, or the picker to pick them, nor the packing plant to pack them, the haulage company to transport them, the supermarket to stock them nor the consumer to buy them.

This all just "happens." It happens because at each stage of the process people are acting in their own self interest, voluntarilly. the voluntary society (anarchy) is everywhere. It is society.

So a better analogy might be:

"Once upon a time there was anarchy, then there was government, tommorrow there will be something else but anarchy will always exist as long as human beings do."

I agree, except for:

So a better analogy might be:

-Better- = your opinion

Mine story was an efficient summary. The rest is pointless to whether or not 'Anarchy' is "possible/exists", but can be fun to point out anyways I guess. Much like the 10 commandments and how you can basically just boil them down to '..do unto others...'.

You explained why Anarchy cannot be, or always is, nicely. If you start anarchy it is just a temporary state of perception which results in, the end of anarchy, or as you put it, the 'acceptance' that we 'are'(essentially) anarchy.

Are all these folks chasing what they already have?

Not chasing, trying to assert maybe?

Perhaps Anarchy already exists and "the COMMUNITY" (the greater good) is merely the highest manifestation of organized crime.