Anarchy is spontaneous order and society is built upon it. No State compels the farmer to grow carrots, or the picker to pick them, nor the packing plant to pack them, the haulage company to transport them, the supermarket to stock them nor the consumer to buy them.
This all just "happens." It happens because at each stage of the process people are acting in their own self interest, voluntarilly. the voluntary society (anarchy) is everywhere. It is society.
So a better analogy might be:
"Once upon a time there was anarchy, then there was government, tommorrow there will be something else but anarchy will always exist as long as human beings do."
I agree, except for:
-Better- = your opinion
Mine story was an efficient summary. The rest is pointless to whether or not 'Anarchy' is "possible/exists", but can be fun to point out anyways I guess. Much like the 10 commandments and how you can basically just boil them down to '..do unto others...'.
You explained why Anarchy cannot be, or always is, nicely. If you start anarchy it is just a temporary state of perception which results in, the end of anarchy, or as you put it, the 'acceptance' that we 'are'(essentially) anarchy.
Are all these folks chasing what they already have?
Not chasing, trying to assert maybe?