Secret top developer with a track record of one of the best in the world, has indicated for over 6 months that he wants to work on migrating LasseCash (in a generic way) to MAGI.
For you who dont know MAGI, its a second layer to Hive for smart contracts, whereas developers can write in any programming language and it has zero fees, making it potentially the best ever blockchain in the whole world.
I have been following the development of MAGI and been in contact with many of the best developers, today one of them confirmed that he plan to migrate LasseCash... its huge news for me... It can potentially make LasseCash the most sofisticated crypto product ever.
Imagine the web2 SoMe's begin to censor crypto news?? Where people go??? Well in my book the best place would be LasseCash that is censorship resistant and all text is on the blockchain... it seems like no one cares now, but lets see one day in the future!?!?!?
You heard it here first.
Lasse Ehlers
Posted using LasseCash
Is this the same as the secret rocket scientist at NASA that told you the Earth is flat? Or is it the same unnamed guy at that startup taxi company that said they might use your shitcoin?
It's hard to keep track of your fantasy cast of imaginary characters.
Yes, we know you are delusional. I wasn't asking why you have a fantasy cast of imaginary characters. We all know that you can't make real people out of bullshit. The closest you've ever come to that is creating those "professional bloggers" sockpuppet accounts for your DHF proposal and using AI to generate their posts promoting your favorite crypto scams.
If you hadn't added that last line it would have looked more like a realistic Grok 3 response. That's your problem. Grok 3 is neutral in it's responses but as a narcissist low IQ flat Earther you can't help but editing and making up Grok responses to try to counterfeit an authoritative endorsement.
Failed DHF scammer gonna scam I guess. If if he can't pump his shitcoin like his email scammer turned crypto scammer idol.
Thank you. That makes your deception much clearer. You started by trying to give Grok 3 a leading question but since you don't understand how questions work your first prompt in the linked session was a pathetic whine. Not the "Grok 3 tell me a bit about LasseCash as a product:"
But the misquoting doesn't end there.
It's the classic "garbage in, garbage out" in computer science. Grok 3 is a chatbot. You feed it your self-promotional bullshit and Grok 3 has very few other resources about you shitcoin to draw from.
So, after your whine prompt you skipped all that garbage that you gave a chatbot and it repeated back to you. Then you gave the actual prompt "ok in 3 lines" because you didn't want to copy-paste what is obviously repeated garbage. It turns out as a plagiarist you have some minimum standard. Good for you.
Then you skipped the part of the second Grok response that stated "Here’s your vision in 3 lines:" because that shows the chatbot is just repeating back to you the garbage you gave it. That's not Grok's actual evaluation of your shitcoin. Grok 3 was telling you your own delusional vision about your failed LasseCash crypto scheme.
Normally I'd point out that if you gave Grok 3 Mein Kampf whatever the "Here’s your vision in 3 lines:" would also be bullshit. But I've seen a little antisemitism in a few of your posts so I don't think you'd necessarily see Hitler's vision as complete bullshit.
That last line now makes sense in context. "Keep shipping real features and adoption — respect follows results, not explanations." That refers back to the whine prompt you edited out.
Thanks buddy for proving once again you deceptively edit your Grok 3 responses. Much appreciated!
Since you couldn't understand my response after you shared how you edited your Grok session I asked Grok to dumb down my response for you so you could understand it. Grok said a six year old should be able to understand this. I asked Grok if it could go down to a two year old's understanding but Grok couldn't go that far down to your level. Sorry Lasse. This is the best your chatbot could do:
Explained at a six year old's level for Lasse Ehlers:
Grok is a chatbot. It mostly answers based on what you type into it. You typed in self-promotional stuff about your coin. Grok summarized your self-promotional stuff back to you. That’s not Grok “endorsing” your coin—it’s Grok paraphrasing your own pitch.
When you shared the Grok quotes, you left out the parts that would make that obvious.
So it looks like you edited the exchange to make Grok seem like it praised you, when it really just repeated your input.