If you hadn't added that last line it would have looked more like a realistic Grok 3 response. That's your problem. Grok 3 is neutral in it's responses but as a narcissist low IQ flat Earther you can't help but editing and making up Grok responses to try to counterfeit an authoritative endorsement.
Failed DHF scammer gonna scam I guess. If if he can't pump his shitcoin like his email scammer turned crypto scammer idol.
Thank you. That makes your deception much clearer. You started by trying to give Grok 3 a leading question but since you don't understand how questions work your first prompt in the linked session was a pathetic whine. Not the "Grok 3 tell me a bit about LasseCash as a product:"
But the misquoting doesn't end there.
It's the classic "garbage in, garbage out" in computer science. Grok 3 is a chatbot. You feed it your self-promotional bullshit and Grok 3 has very few other resources about you shitcoin to draw from.
So, after your whine prompt you skipped all that garbage that you gave a chatbot and it repeated back to you. Then you gave the actual prompt "ok in 3 lines" because you didn't want to copy-paste what is obviously repeated garbage. It turns out as a plagiarist you have some minimum standard. Good for you.
Then you skipped the part of the second Grok response that stated "Here’s your vision in 3 lines:" because that shows the chatbot is just repeating back to you the garbage you gave it. That's not Grok's actual evaluation of your shitcoin. Grok 3 was telling you your own delusional vision about your failed LasseCash crypto scheme.
Normally I'd point out that if you gave Grok 3 Mein Kampf whatever the "Here’s your vision in 3 lines:" would also be bullshit. But I've seen a little antisemitism in a few of your posts so I don't think you'd necessarily see Hitler's vision as complete bullshit.
That last line now makes sense in context. "Keep shipping real features and adoption — respect follows results, not explanations." That refers back to the whine prompt you edited out.
Thanks buddy for proving once again you deceptively edit your Grok 3 responses. Much appreciated!
I simply pointed out your deception because you were stupid enough to give me a link to everything you edited out.
I dont know what you talk about
That's a low IQ flat Earther problem, not mine.
I just quoted Grok 3 and you make a big deal out of it.
You only quoted maybe 10 percent of that Grok 3 linked session and your quote was 100 percent out of context.
If you think the low effort/misleading way you did that is how you quote from a primary source then there is no way in Hell you ever went to any University; Hamburger, Clown, or otherwise.
Go get a simple job
But I don't want your job making edible flat Earth maps at Pizza Hut and if I got a job as a milkman I'd probably end up fathering your next child.
let the big issues in the world be solved by us, the big guys.
But a crypto noob LARPing as an "expert" like you can't solve anything economic. Go back and look at the pathetic attempt you made at comparing your shitcoin to real cryptocurrency.
If you hadn't added that last line it would have looked more like a realistic Grok 3 response. That's your problem. Grok 3 is neutral in it's responses but as a narcissist low IQ flat Earther you can't help but editing and making up Grok responses to try to counterfeit an authoritative endorsement.
Failed DHF scammer gonna scam I guess. If if he can't pump his shitcoin like his email scammer turned crypto scammer idol.
Thank you. That makes your deception much clearer. You started by trying to give Grok 3 a leading question but since you don't understand how questions work your first prompt in the linked session was a pathetic whine. Not the "Grok 3 tell me a bit about LasseCash as a product:"
But the misquoting doesn't end there.
It's the classic "garbage in, garbage out" in computer science. Grok 3 is a chatbot. You feed it your self-promotional bullshit and Grok 3 has very few other resources about you shitcoin to draw from.
So, after your whine prompt you skipped all that garbage that you gave a chatbot and it repeated back to you. Then you gave the actual prompt "ok in 3 lines" because you didn't want to copy-paste what is obviously repeated garbage. It turns out as a plagiarist you have some minimum standard. Good for you.
Then you skipped the part of the second Grok response that stated "Here’s your vision in 3 lines:" because that shows the chatbot is just repeating back to you the garbage you gave it. That's not Grok's actual evaluation of your shitcoin. Grok 3 was telling you your own delusional vision about your failed LasseCash crypto scheme.
Normally I'd point out that if you gave Grok 3 Mein Kampf whatever the "Here’s your vision in 3 lines:" would also be bullshit. But I've seen a little antisemitism in a few of your posts so I don't think you'd necessarily see Hitler's vision as complete bullshit.
That last line now makes sense in context. "Keep shipping real features and adoption — respect follows results, not explanations." That refers back to the whine prompt you edited out.
Thanks buddy for proving once again you deceptively edit your Grok 3 responses. Much appreciated!
I simply pointed out your deception because you were stupid enough to give me a link to everything you edited out.
That's a low IQ flat Earther problem, not mine.
You only quoted maybe 10 percent of that Grok 3 linked session and your quote was 100 percent out of context.
If you think the low effort/misleading way you did that is how you quote from a primary source then there is no way in Hell you ever went to any University; Hamburger, Clown, or otherwise.
But I don't want your job making edible flat Earth maps at Pizza Hut and if I got a job as a milkman I'd probably end up fathering your next child.
But a crypto noob LARPing as an "expert" like you can't solve anything economic. Go back and look at the pathetic attempt you made at comparing your shitcoin to real cryptocurrency.