You are completely correct in every point.
There is a reason we're subsumed in controversy during these events, and that's because we're ruled by gangsters that use blackmail to control child molesters in political office to profit from our suffering. These events are all committed by that mob for that reason.
It's such a mess with so many factions involved that it's almost impossible to target which one is behind which fuck-up in any given event.
Even Charlie Kirk himself, to me was an instrument of the criminal organizations.
Whether he knew that, or found out later is debatable.
And I do think he did a lot of good, and tried to be real and righteous about his organization's mission.
Of course, lately it's become a lot more acceptable to move off-script for many republicans. Hell, even Tucker Carlson is saying some wild things now.
I don't trust Tucker at all, but sometimes he says things that I think are correct.
And that's part of the problem. There's money to be made massaging the truth, and making sure it doesn't go in a certain direction. You don't even have to lie most of the time, just omit or stay off some subjects.
Charlie's audience is the reason he had to start speaking about some of these things because in most cases we are to the right of the pundits.
Same is true of Tucker. Candace Owens, idk. It's hard to say with her because she says some things that just sound crazy lol.
Every successful lie must contain a kernel of truth. The lack of such kernels has been the cause of the collapse of so many propaganda narratives lately, and I think Carlson has been tasked to recover some of the market by completely reversing himself on 9/11. It's been a generation now, and the fruits of that astounding fraud have been resown and reharvested, the perps mostly dead or still beyond account.
I don't trust anyone, no matter how crazy they sound, because my understanding of the reality extant makes them look staid and respectable. Emmanuel's husband was one of the craziest allegations Candace made, and she's withstood legal challenges to the point where I consider it all but proved true now.
Christian Zionism is what Charlie was paid by Zionists to promote, and his late epiphany and challenging that dogma was, as you point out, necessary to keep TPUSA useful because only psychopathic narcissists were capable of denying that Trump is compromised, Bondi and her groveling toadies Patel and Bongino are blatantly lying about Epstein's operations, and ignoring that threat to the JudeoChristian hasbara had to be addressed or it would be completely disregarded.
But Charlie didn't consider how his own murder could completely obscure it, and that is what is being done. However, any that do not now abandon that dogma don't matter because they're simply incapable of rational thought given the glaring proof it is utterly false. Many former MAGA guys have faced the truth, and Charlie's murder is what has dislodged them from their false belief. Because I think blackmail is one of the most potent mechanisms corrupting America and the West, Kirk's assassination is ripping the cover away because I have never seen such a flimsy plaster as the absolute BS narrative we've been handed about Charlie Kirk's murder in my life.
Again, only psychopathic narcissists could think such feeble Machiavellian tactics couldn't fail, only because their certainty they can't fail is absolute and completely deranged. Anyone capable of independent thought that takes more than a cursory look at the murder cannot fail to see the FBI is full of crap, and the more and longer they look, the more crap they will plainly see. I think this is the clinal boundary that the majority of people will transcend to grasp we are at war and losing because we're depending on our enemy to defend us.
There are polls out that claim most Americans under 30 believe the USA shouldn't be supporting Israel. And that's a very vague, and non-specific way to ask that question.
8 years ago if you talked about this on Youtube, Twitter, etc. you'd be immediately met with claims of antisemitism, and labeled a conspiracy-tard.
But over the past 2 years I think is where I saw things really start change online, and that an also be deceiving because we end up in these echo chambers, but I am seeing this talked about by regular people in mainstream venues now.
There's a theory that Charlie's clip-on microphone detonated or fired a projectile into his neck, and why is that?
Oh because a couple months ago Israel proudly showed the world how they detonated pagers and cell-phones on people they claimed were terrorists.
Then Netanyahu gave Trump a golden pager or cell-phone to "commemorate Israel inventing the cell phone"; which they absolutely did not invent. I don't even know why they would make a claim that's demonstrably false.
If you listen to former CIA agents talk about dealing with Mossad and intel from there they talk about how little they trust them, and how they always leave spy devices behind when they visit the embassies or other buildings. They harass our intel officers and ambassadors in their country as well.
It doesn't sound like an ally at all.
But then the USA has done other things to our allies that aren't quite as bad, but it's the same principle I guess.
This is not wholly organic, although the tendency is. I've seen demonstrations of Goolag altering comment sections of Tubeyou videos such that a couple with differing views each sees a different comment section. Each sees comments aligned with their views and excludes comments presenting differing views. The effect of this granular censorship is to prevent political discussion and the moderation of views on either side that enables agreement. It furthers the division we suffer, and it demonstrates very clearly that division is being constructed. The effect is to prevent a rational synthesis from emerging to effectively oppose Zionism in subject polities.
Kissinger once stated that to be America's enemy was very dangerous, but to be America's friend was fatal. Anyone that has paid attention to the alternating promises and betrayals of the Kurds since Gulf War I under Bush I has seen this happen serially. Where MIGA isn't understood to be the underlying policy of the countries of the West by such allies is when the worst such betrayals are possible. There is also confusion caused by parallel cultures to Rabbinic Judaism/Talmudism, such as the Parsee, Jesuits, and MAGA, not competitors like the Thugee, Roma, or Hashashim, but cryptojews in effect, which I think creates the very pro-Israel current in India, the USA and the EU, and the Ukraine and Russia today.
The Ukraine is a vivid example of these machinations destroying a country(s) and it's people(s) where parallel policies are implemented in all the polities involved creating a covert synthesis that is completely obscured to the different demographics the overt policies are tailored to. However because the political administrations of all the polities involved in the war are all subjugated to Zionists through covert blackmail, none of the policies of the polities have the effect claimed to be intended, but rather work together to achieve the true goals of Zionists, which is to depopulate the Ukraine and acquire the clay with all the economic assets flowing to Jews.
After all, the Ukraine is the real homeland of the Ashkenazim.
Yes I agree, there is no "good side" of the war in Ukraine.
Right wingers in the USA tend to root for Russia, and the left for Ukraine.
The right only roots for them because they believe the idea that Putin is some anti-globalist warrior for Christianity. It's false, and easily seen through if you simply look into his ties to the same sect of Judaism that Trump is tied to.
They always operate this way.
The voice in the ear of the king.
While I understand where you are coming from pointing to their "divide and conquer" tactics in most nations; I don't agree that it's quite that simple.
Yes, the left & right in the USA share criticism of our Zionism problem, but there is little that we can agree about when it comes to home.
Both sides of our political system are shadow-puppets, and they do enact little wins for their constituents here and there. Both sides lose overall.
But the right in particular, has remained largely consistent on it's political plans(the people, not the politicians).
Whereas Biden and the Clintons are to the right of Trump if you simply go back in history.
The right has identified the true threat to all nations: demographic atomization and replacement.
This is why the left has always called them racist, and demonized nationalism while associating it with Fascism/National Socialism(ironic since, socialist).
National Socialism agrees with a lot of the left's economic prescriptions, but only on the basis of a nation. With nation being based in ethnos as per it's original definitions.
The left invites foreign people into the nations, and then empowers them through their own ethnic grievances against the native nationalists or even populist nationalists.
The reason they do this is because when you have a 90% white nation you do have to divide them politically to hamstring them.
But once that number is 60% divided into 30% halves, and then there's 16% Latino base, and 13% black base; the divisions will start to occur naturally.
They speak different languages, and no longer share a culture.
The internet itself has largely destroyed cultures seemingly around the world.
There's also the fact that revolutions in nations are often affected by a minority. That doesn't have to mean an ethnic minority, but even ideological.
It could be focused around language even.
This is why the left and right cannot really work together against Zionism.
Both sides are pro in the govt, and the people want outcomes that are mutually exclusive to one another domestically.
Only in the past 5 years have white people started to express an identity as such though. Because for most of the time they have been fighting against the claims they are racist for looking out for their own interests in their own nations.
I generally agree with your statements above, except a couple things. The people of almost all countries, regardless of ethnic backgrounds, political party, or religion, are almost unanimously against brownstone operations pimping children to child molesters that are subsequently elevated to high office because they can be very closely controlled by blackmail. Many psyops and an almost constant stream of distractions are being executed in order to prevent rapprochement of divided populations on this issue.
Also, there has always been a susurration of nationalism, White and otherwise. I agree it has lately increased in efficacy and volume in the West because of the increasing recognition that the West is being deliberately destroyed by invasive immigration and other means, by traitorous politicians (presumably those being blackmailed).