Interesting @eonwarped.
If I understand this correctly, a place where a bot would seem to shine, with the ability to assess probabilities faster than a human could and thus choose accordingly, is the place where it fails.
I'm wondering, within the law of large numbers, where this is because each time the dice (die?) are rolled, it's like a reset. There's nothing stopping the same numbers that were just rolled to appear, just as there's nothing stopping a new set of numbers to appear.
In other words, a bot would do better at a card game, where each card revealed is removed and therefore narrows the field of cards.
The thing about the random generator, though, as opposed to real life die rolling, is the generator is based on some sort of algorithm, right, mathematical equations, that are skewed to the house to some degree. It seems to me that if it were possible, the bot would be better off trying to assess and then mimic the algorithm. I guess what I'm getting at, is the algorithm truly random, or is it an array of rolls so large it just appears to be random, but is actually following a predictable course, that over time (however long that might be) could be gamed? I'm just kind of thinking out loud here, since I'm not that aware of how random generators work, or how the laws of large numbers and that of probability intermingle.
Still, I find it fascinating that this might be the place where a bot would hold less than desired sway over things. Almost as fascinating as the fact that people are always wanting to gain advantage, regardless of the odds, the outcomes or their own best interests.
What you are getting at here is the nature of the randomness itself, that's a whole other can of worms.
My assumptions of the post is that the randomness is perfect (e.g. sourced by quantum let's say.
Even in the case of perfect randomness, the odds are dead simple to calculate. No bot is going to change these odds.
As soon as you are in pseudorandom territory, I believe there are some theoretical guarantees about "how random" a source is based on algorithm but that's beyond what I even wanted to mention :)
A bot can only do well if the computed odds of the game can net positive expected gains, and that's really the point here: the game magic dice is well understood. The odds are simply against the better in favor of the house. Bot or not, nobody will win against the house. Again, assuming random source is truly random.
Posted using Partiko Android