"Not Bernie. @joe.public was censored. Not the spammer who posted tens of thousands of pictures of poop in a toilet, but those that opposed that spam, are censored by @themarkymark."
That seems silly as you describe it. It's an obvious and understandable reason for outrage. I sincerely hope it isn't just a shield of nepotism protecting Bernie from these anti-spam measures.
Still I'd like to see @themarkymark articulate his current perspective on that matter. If only I could see what @joe.public has to say too, even if it might be "less than tactful" as you put it.
I've lived through a few bouts of acute tact deficiency in my day, and it's not like he could reach through the internet and wring my neck.
I see by your vote on it you have seen @themarkymark's comment I have.
Because I don't know how this link will be treated given the censorship mechanism, I have also provided this screenshot of the comment by @joe.public.
The link works.
That comment by @themarkymark is only a single sentence framing his sentiment. It's obviously not a comprehensive articulation of the situation from his perspective. Hopefully we will get one.
Pretty sure he doesn't want to say any more about this at all.
Sort of seems that way.