Thank you very much for this answer. I resonate with it. Can give similar examples of having automatically stopped contacts without really leading hot arguments, only in the very beginning where the two involved, sensed that it could lead to more damage than good, so a heated conversation did not start. In this sense, avoiding contact probably takes place out of consideration of how much discrepancy the other can handle.
If that happened to us I'd come back to a lot of dead animals and likely a dead garden if it was summer.
This is such an important thing to be reminded of. You could replace the sentence into all different and individual needs and circumstances. There are countless reasons why it's of no good to put people into quarantines.
forcibly removed from their homes
that really happened? It's almost like I can't believe it. What a traumatic experience this must be.
I believe that as long as neither side tries to force things on the other, then a compromise can be reached, but if they are supporting force then they become a danger to your safety, in which case it's likely better to part ways.
I agree.
HaHa, I like your expression that opinionated people don't "gel" with you. Here it's the same. I am not supportive, either :) I remember being accused of listening to charlatans and let my mind being "seduced" in all kinds of odd directions, where I made the "mistake" to talk openly about my current interests. It's years ago but it was a sign of the times that this friend of mine and I parted. My main reason to end this friendship was that she wanted to force me with words to assimilate myself to her view and I refused in doing so. She was so outraged and aggressive that I finally told her she was not a friend but a despot and that I don't need to be lectured. She was not able to stop, showing teeth and claws, until I set a clear limit. To my very surprise that finally calmed her down. Even though she admitted that she is unable to respect me, she wished me a farewell with what she called my "own spiritual path". There was not much more to add.
You guys can really type!
Whereas you prefer the visual route through images. 😁
if i ever type a paragraph i add 3 pics and make it a post!
HaHa! :D I could type endlessly as you may have noticed. Got really good at it. Snort.
The problem is, you'll never convince someone who believes he is in danger that he willfully wishes to kill you. And so it's the other way around and the spinning goes on and on and on...
So, what's the question or answer no one can really admit? Maybe it is not the active will to kill someone but to accept that deaths will come and I cannot indeed care about the many dying, for that would go over my limits.
The difference is "do I want to give a politically correct answer"? Or an answer which goes more with the realization that I am not responsible for other peoples decisions?
The whole topic is a great trap. Pandoras box opened.
I was dubious myself, when I first heard it, but low and behold, even our main stream media was reprting on it.
https://www.news.com.au/national/south-australia/south-australia-records-two-new-local-covid19-cases/news-story/a02a71128d94ae1f3e22c9f14192ddef
I guess we all like to know where we stand, ultimately. 😆
Lockdown is also killing people. Government is bad.