You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Dear Ned & Steemit Inc.

in #steem5 years ago (edited)

First of all, I hope you had a great start into 2019, and here's my belated but still enthusiastic Happy New Year for you :-)

Honestly I wouldn't even have seen that memo without you, so thanks for directing our attention to it. I wonder how tiny an announcement can even get...

Some people say that Steemit, Inc selling off their stake may lead to a price drop on a short term but help us to gain more decentralization in the long term. Would you second that view, and could that be the other (positive) side of the coin?

Rebuying their tokens at 10 Cents could be fun for the middle class shareholders.

Happy Sunday, and again thanks for the research! Resteemed

Sort:  

And do what? A person would still have to spend hundreds of thousands of fiat money to actually do anything here. No one is going to over power the freedom account votes for the sham witness situation.

Then would someone want to put tens of thousands or hundereds of thousands into a blockchain with so many problems where everyone has pretty much lost hope and it keeps slipping down CoinMarketCap further and further?

Why not invest in coins in the top 10 that show promise and not deal with all the non communication and BS?

Well I can only speak as a content creator, time investor and socializer here. Other coins are simply not that attractive to someone who's built their brand and network on Steem over years. Yes, the performance is weak and we've lost many users, but those who attended Steemfest in Krákow know that the project is anything but dead.

Now having more Steem Power means having more influence within the Steem community, and that'd be my reason to buy more Steem at its bottom, even though I realize that you couldn't sell it like this to an investor :)

However, if more of us rebought Steemit Inc's stake and gained more influence within the network, we could direct the ship into a different and probably more promising direction. Is that naive?

When Dan Larimer left this project we were in a similar situation: many people started their power down since they thought this was the end. But it was not.

So I don't think it'd make much sense to do anything right now, since we don't know what's actually going on. Holding and constantly increasing one's stake through content creation is surely not a bad idea if you still believe in the silverlight - and I do :-)

Congrats on that monster car btw - Audi is my favorite brand of all :-)

Have a good Monday, Brian!

You have a great positive attitude. Most of what I read on this thread is just speculation. Maybe Steem Inc are selling off some or all of their Steem or they could just be moving it around.

I think a big positive is the performance of our DApps. Check out this screenshot I just took from State of the DApps.

DApps.jpg

Six Steem DApps in the top 10 despite all the chaos.

I hope Steemians give @ned/Steemit Inc a chance to explain a little more about what's happening before selling off Steem and buying pitchforks.

Well most of the time crypto is just speculation :-) But Steem has a big asset only few others have: Proof of Brain!

And that gets perfectly reflected in the screenshot you published - great adding, thanks for that!

If we can perform like this at our worst moments, imagine the stats when we’re full speed ahead again 🙌

Positivity rulezzz :)
Have a nice Monday!

I must say @surfermarly your optimism is highly contagious, you have given me another reason to stay in here no matter what!

I love you :)

Haha, I hadn’t been expecting to receive a love confession today - but thanks 😄

Am always happy to spread the positivity around the Globe 🤩🙌

You are welcome, saying I love you is a habit that rubbed off on me from my mother, it's what she says before she says goodbye on phone call irrespective of who she's talking to...

Thanks for the reply!

I don't want to sound overly negative but the attrition rate is terrible here for a reason. I'm one of the stubborn fools who have stuck around. There was so much potential for this to actually be something a lot greater but almost everyone can agree with me that hope has been lost here.

The witness voting situation has and always will be a sham and for a supposed content creation platform not one content creator in a first would country could really support themselves off this platform.

The need for additional revenue sources was obvious long ago but there is so much misdirection from Steemit INC it isn't even funny.

Things aren't good here at all and it isn't just about the price of STEEM.

The majority of people don't have the money to to make any sort of tangable impact on their influence here and even if they do put in $1000, or $5,000, or $10,000 then they are more likely to hog their vote in an attempt to recoup their investment.

It is just a game of don't get dumped on.

Well I don't think that you sound too negative, you're just pointing out some facts.

I'll be staying since the network still works for me and there are still many enthusiastic people pushing their developments forward. Also it looks as if Hivemind was just around the corner, and that could really bring some new opportunities for man different target groups.

Let's see what the future holds.

I'm going to buy at least 2,000,000 coins if price drops to 0.01$.
The time has come for some power redistribution on Steem.

You're welcome.

Some people say that Steemit, Inc selling off their stake may lead to a price drop on a short term but help us to gain more decentralization in the long term. Would you second that view, and could that be the other (positive) side of the coin?

There's usually a positive side, but that doesn't mean they should be able to sell stake which hasn't really been acquired in an absolutely fair way. Actually, Steemit Inc. always said that they would use their stake mostly for the development and improvement of Steem. But without any transparency, how much of that is believable if they do sell it?

Rebuying their tokens at 10 Cents could be fun for the middle-class shareholders

Sorry, but no. I'm not staking hundreds of thousands of Steem, just for it to drop significantly in price, because the entitiy who created this blockchain and mined 100+ million Steempower, decided to sell it all. Now, I'm not saying that more decentralisation is bad, but those funds should be in a fund, which is only being used for development and improvement of Steem & it's ecosystem.


happy sunday :)

but that doesn't mean they should be able to sell stake which hasn't really been acquired in an absolutely fair way.

I think considering all the early miners who got in, was any of the start well thought out?

Hence @whatsup's idea for a decentralized Steem Development Fund. Because currently a centralized one failed to work as intended.

Posted using Partiko Android

Positive Side??? Did you got an answer from @ned or @steemit spokes person? on your post?

#enoughsaid

Looking forward to do exactly this!

Posted using Partiko Android