Nice work @pfunk - I recently did a vehicle mounted time lapse at 1 second interval which can still be slightly too long. The best and really only way is to continually sharpen then saw by doing more and more. (thanks @mweich - i had gotten an email in which it showed me you mentioned me) - now following pfunk as well.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Thanks for the advice :) I might try one more timelapse with this DSLR but I've now realized that doing timelapses with any SLR you want to keep for a while is not a good idea, considering shutter life.
Yes, you can push 800 to 1200 images out in no time which does represent a slice of the shutter duration pie. I used to care about it too much, now I just treat it like any other tool. Certainly, if you are considering resale value - playing around with time lapses is foolish! Nearly brings photography back to the epoch of film when there was a consumable to factor in... I also think sometimes video that is sped up looks quite nice in some shorter duration situations... does feel like cheating though.
When I shoot in RAW or ARW, you have one set of files, then after processing you have the JPG set and the disk space can get chewed up quickly.