I think the question your post doesn't ask, but implies is:
If something isn't sustainable on its on merits - should it be allowed to fail?
And I think that is a question a lot of people are afraid to answer.
I think the question your post doesn't ask, but implies is:
If something isn't sustainable on its on merits - should it be allowed to fail?
And I think that is a question a lot of people are afraid to answer.
That is the exact question we all need to ask. I think too many initiatives have business models that rely on the reward pool for their only means of making profit.
BTW, I swear I'm not stalking you. I listened to this article in a text to speech app and this comment struck me before I knew who wrote it.
I am fine to be stalked :)
Good to know... 😈
Exactly what I was thinking as I read this. Surely you need to go back to the business model, figure out why it's failing and if something can be changed to remedy that.
The same can be said for many, many meatspace businesses, too.
Exactly. In the meat space it's a given, so I don't see why the same shouldn't be reflected here.
I am not afraid to answer! :)
If a game or project is not sustainable on its own it MUST fail. I personally will drive the wooden stake through that heart if others are not willing! 😂
Are you sure you don't have any "Helsing" in your family background?
The truth is something that can hurt people. Best to not proxy the suffering. We put pets "to sleep" for a reason. Dignity. It isn't considered inhumane to do that, so I agree with you - end the suffering, and move onto the next.
Endings are just new beginnings. Opportunities to learn.
Failed businesses are failed!
There is no government.
So there is no handout or bailout.
The end.
Almost all hive projects are running on life assistance. If hive project were humans, they would be deep down in the hospital
It should be, unless it really brings visibility outside to hive and good onboarding so it has value for hive as a whole