You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Free Speech is Our Use-case, Everything Else is Secondary.

in #dbuzz3 years ago

Supporting publication of stolen content is not what Hive Blockchain is about.

Stolen content is not the same as freedom of speech. There is a big difference and you are merely playing wordolitics to state your view. Justification of an action with the use of the phrase FREE SPEECH is not wanted either on the chain.

I have seen you argue your point in the post.
https://hive.blog/hive-193084/@podewils/astronomy-picture-of-the-day-bf3154d5f19e2#@hivewatcher/qq7ptp

And it is obviously not an image taken by the publisher with no sources indicated. It is clearly a spammy post using any content found to gain a reward.

There was no thought put into that post other than an image to post and get a reward for. If this is what D.Buzz is about then D.Buzz is the joke

Sort:  

Review the entire feed on D.Buzz to se what it is about

  • And we don't support "stolen" content

We focus on upvoting original.content but we don't censor text, users choose what they see and we have yet to hear from an owner of any content they felt was "stolen" or misused

Posted via D.Buzz

You are pointing me to a blurry image of something that looks like nothing, on the grounds that it proves the image he posted is not his

  • How does that zoomed in blurry section of the image he posted prove the image is not his?

Where is the original source link from the owner?

Posted via D.Buzz

I’m busy, do your community moderator job and don’t play dumb

Again, you are not speaking professional here and are assuming that I playing dumb.

Someone points out to you that someone in your community published someone else's content and got some rewards for it, then after being warned they go on and again publish a dubious painting. I point out that they are still doing it because it's a professional painting including a signature, and you kept defending him. That's why I assumed you were just willing to defend your users without being objective.

No, I didnt still defend him after that.

  • If you check, I told him that you were right.

I also told you that, but it may have got lost in the threads.. again, it's not necessarily the rulings I disagree with but the language you use.

Posted via D.Buzz

I agree it seems like he lied and that he shouldn't he curated.

It might also be good to make a specific Mutelist for people who plagerise content like that.

But replying:

You liar!

It's unprofessional and gives the appearance of a school yard fight vs. Moderating.

Posted via D.Buzz

Btw, I forgot to ask, have you tried our frontend?

Posted via D.Buzz

Yes I looked and seen much more of the same thing, Spammy posts to get a reward

https://d.buzz/#/@rombtc/c/0rlpinxblgausbpke63rus No value whatsoever to this post.

The same again here. https://d.buzz/#/@reinaldoverdu/c/1efvzxndjcw6i1m3c0ti78 absolutely nothing of value. nonsense posting spammy for rewards.

Have you used Twitter before?

  • I hope you realize you are talking about something subjective.

Which pkatform has more users, Twitter, or Medium?

Which one is used more?

Which one has a higher market cap?

Posted via D.Buzz

It’s fine. It’s free speech, it’s not just milking...

55409729-8F55-43AA-B482-84E2E1962225.png

B696238C-FA31-4C33-9B33-8EFB6B78BE60.png