I've got to hand it to Ed Miliband, he's approaching Net Zero like he approaches a bacon sandwich - with quite some gusto!
But his route to the goal is facing some just criticisms....
Centralisation, Costs, and Contradictions
Britain has some of the highest power prices in the developed world. This is not only a problem for bills at home; it's a threat to the competitiveness of British industry and to Labour's own re-election prospects. A majority of the cost is attributed to subsidies, fees, and market distortions intended to hasten green transformation — but ATW we seem to be getting little in return for this.
One legitimate criticisms of Miliband's approach is that it's too centralized and target-driven. The desire to "decarbonise the electricity grid by 2030" is admirable but this risks distorting other priorities — regional growth, local autonomy, and cheap energy.
Scottish and northern English wind farms, for instance, are sometimes paid subsidies not to generate electricity because the grid cannot take it. Rather than allowing regions to determine their own local energy prices or invest in smart decentralised networks, policy is wedded to taking everything through the creaky, slow national system.
A decentralised approach — with areas setting their own prices and investing within their communities in storage, transport, and heat networks — may well be able to deliver cleaner and cheaper outcomes. Germany's Energiewende is a half-way house: community-owned generation and city grids have driven down prices and secured local approval. But Miliband's "one-size-fits-all" drive for rapid decarbonisation risks delivering "the absurd spectacle of wind farms being paid to cut back their output."
The political risk here is obvious. When the transition costs fall disproportionately on ordinary consumers and benefits are in the far-off future, then the net-zero project isn't going to get any support.
Final Thoughts...
This seems like a great example of a national socialist policy just failing. It seems to be dragging down those regions which are generating clean energy without a lot of positives feeding into other, dirtier regions.
Maybe letting the regions having a bit more autonomy would be a good idea, the current approach is just going to annoy everyone and possibly not deliver the intended results...
Congratulations @revisesociology! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPIn Germany a big part of the problem is the over-controlling by the government. Many little villages and even small cities want to be more decentralized, but can't make it through the process of permits and all that bs that is put onto them. Even though the government and the biggest part of society wants that change. Decentralization and allowing it is a key factor in this. Some regulations must exist, of course, but to a manageable extend. Nobody wants to sit in the dark because some kid kicked out the village grid.
Drill baby Drill!
fuck net zero and agenda 2030.
decentralisation will never work. take tony "baby killer and convicted sexual deviant" blair's example of enhanced devolution to wales and scotland. Both " assemblies" have totally fucked up their respective NHS, education and transport budgets and provision to the public... then have the blatant cheek to blame westminster!
Scrap the welsh assembly, run by a coalition of neo marxists and fruit loop nationalists, and return everything to their paymasters in London.
their national football team are shite too