Sorry that is incorrect. Once I purchase the rights I am free to use the images as I own the rights. As stated above my image was not as clear.
Your comment is not correct nor is your finding.
There really needs a body that holds Hive Watchers accountable to their actions it is damaging and costly.
Hello. It was already explained by the community to you in the comment section here.
Curated photography/photo contest tags are for submitting own and original photography, not someone else's (either bought or free use). Any photography that was not taken by the author of the post has to be clearly sourced.
Buying photography/photo art does not make you the author/photo artist who created the photos. Neither does it give you a copyright. They only give you a right to use for commercial purposes.
These photos are the main highlight of your post and are published in curated tags - by doing so you claim to be the author of these photos and claim copyright to them.
If you think that you can bulk drop photography into curated tags and photo contests that you purchased from stock websites to farm rewards, then you understood it the wrong way round.
As you said use for commercial purposes. You have made an allegation of plagiarism. That is a different matter which you're convoluting. This is the 3rd occasion, you previously marked one of my other photos as a breach which it was not. You can use the same image so long as the post is different which I did.
At no point did you apologise or rebute.
An explanation IS provided in the comments section of the post. Your response is Nul and void.
I am calling for a public apology or will commence a campaign to have you hard forked out..
An institution that has poor accountability and makes allegations without speaking to the party involved is the very definition of poor governance.
As the service I use is for political and business I am aware of what I can and can't do with them..
You explaining it to me incorrectly is quite offensive.
I am seeking an apology
Can you please elaborate on which of the previous 2 investigations we were incorrect?
They appear valid to me.
Or recycling post? (Our comment was correct. It was a double post. Although you did it by accident)
https://hive.blog/hive-187719/@melbourneswest/beer-saturday
The previous photography plagiarism post? (Unless it is your photo published in curated photography tag, the investigation was valid)
https://hive.blog/teamaustralia/@melbourneswest/good-night-rest-up-monday-is-over
We explained how authorship and copyright works and what publishing now own photography in curated tags work.
Please do not publish photography plagiarism.
Again you're incorrect and pulling statements and law out of thin air.
You've sent trolls to my account and caused loss of earnings. You need to provide recompense for your errors.
Anyway doesn't matter.
@featheredfriends and @detlev lost authors on their posts because of you.
Mind you, most community groups have bot voting. Pretty sure that's a thing. But you remain silent when you're on the cut.
Who was it that reported it?
These were not submitted in a contest and are not there to farm rewards.
If people don't like the image they can not look at it or they can simply not vote.
I'm seeking