Bombshell: Spike proteins alone CAUSE Covid-19!

[drutter]

A major study by the prestigious Salk Institute reveals that the spike proteins on SarsCoV2 don't just help it infect host cells, they are the cause of the symptoms we call COVID-19! The Salk Institute is widely-known and well-respected for their decades of groundbreaking and impeccable medical research. Their latest findings upend our understanding of this virus, and could have major implications for the unprecedented global vaccination program underway.

Here's my summary of Salk's statement about the study:

---

We know SARSCoV2’s mysterious spike proteins help the virus infect its host by latching on to healthy cells. Now we find they also play a key role in the disease itself. The new study shows exactly how the SARSCoV2 virus attacks the vascular system on a cellular level. Its findings help explain COVID-19’s wide variety of seemingly unconnected complications, including strokes, blood clots, and other vascular symptoms.

Researchers created a “pseudovirus” with a corona of SARSCoV2 spike proteins that did not contain any actual virus, and therefore had no replicating capability. Animal exposure to this pseudovirus resulted in damage and inflammation to endothelial cells lining lung arteries, proving that the spike protein alone is enough to cause disease.

The team then replicated this process in the lab, exposing healthy endothelial cells to the spike protein, damaging the cells' mitochondria by binding ACE2.

Previous studies have shown a similar effect when cells were exposed to the SARSCoV2 virus, but this is the first study to show that the damage occurs when cells are exposed to the spike protein on its own.

---

In other words, the corona of spike proteins around SarsCoV2 are responsible for transmission AND for symptoms - they are the disease! Mainstream media has been quiet about this big news - confirmation that spike proteins can infect cells and cause symptoms on their own, without the SARS virus being involved. What role the virus itself actually plays is no longer clear.

If this entire pandemic is suddenly all about the spike proteins, what does this mean for the mRNA "vaccine", which teaches our cells to create trillions of them?

This graphic comes directly from the US CDC.

Now that we know spike proteins cause the symptoms of Covid-19 even without the SarsCoV2 virus, and the "vaccines" cause us to create these specific proteins, we have to ask... Is that why so many people who took the shot are getting sick? Like in Lytton BC and in Seychelles?

Others are asking similar questions, and the study has been amended with a link to an expert who says, essentially, while we now know that spike proteins alone cause Covid-19 symptoms and deaths, luckily it seems we dodged a bullet here, because the spike proteins generated by vaccination mostly stay within the muscle tissue of your arm (not in the bloodstream where they can do damage).

Whew! Good thing we aren't pumping people with the exact thing that's going to make them sick! Boy, we sure would have looked foolish, if it turned out those dangerous spike proteins were getting all through the body, not just in the upper arm muscle! Hmmm, cases are going up, we better increase the pace of injections! Down with vaccine hesitation! Digital passports and free donuts for all who comply!

Consider me unconvinced. It's far more likely that the new findings bring to light a frightening truth - we are CAUSING Covid-19 in "vaccine" recipients!

That would explain the illness and deaths we're seeing, and it would explain why anyone bringing this information to light is being censored out of the mainstream. I was banned from YouTube yesterday for contradicting health experts, and was previously disciplined for covering the Lytton story, which remains unreported on official channels.

But why don't all recipients come down with illness? Easy; for the same reason that not everybody infected with the virus will come down with symptoms. Sometimes we're naturally immune. Sometimes our body fights it off before it can cause much damage. We get infected by viruses all the time - we're literally full of them, 24/7/365. They don't always get out of control, and they don't always produce symptoms we notice. The same goes for spike proteins - symptoms will vary widely from person to person.

It also fits with recent revelations that "vaccine" recipients are transmitting something to other people, causing vascular symptoms like blood clots and stroke. The Canadian state media is saying we need to be ready for a huge 4th wave coming soon, and that Covid is probably endemic (permanent) now, which makes no sense if the vaccination program is having any positive effect. What do they know that we don't? Is a huge wave of Covid-19, caused by the vaccinations (and maybe transmission to others nearby), about to appear on the horizon?

One thing we now know for sure, and need to spread far and wide: The spike proteins ARE the disease!

DRutter

Comments

[dwinblood]

Thanks for sharing this. I encountered this information too. Yet I've encountered SO MUCH information in the past few days I am kind of overwhelmed on how to write about it all. I'm glad you put this out.

[drutter]

I know exactly what you mean. A suggestion, go after one of the major stories, and do a great job at it. If the rest of us haven't properly covered the other stories when you're done, keep at it. There's just too much to do it all oneself. Better to get the main stories out in a timely manner so the info can spread, than to pack everything into one big post. I think I've probably done 100 posts like this one, over the past year. I know I can't cover everything myself, but I hit what really interests me, and what I think I can do a proper job at.
This whole "vaccine" thing really is THE story right now, in my opinion.

[erh.germany]

Feeling the same. Nevertheless, if you like, check out some more information I put here in my comment.
Greetings to you.

[greatesteem]

If the mainstream now acknowledges that the "vaccines" cause us to manufacture spike proteins, and spike proteins alone cause illness and death, and illness and death are threatening to collapse the health care system and economy....

Shouldn't we run a few tests to make sure the spike proteins we're generating with the vaccines aren't ending up causing illness and death?

[medikatie]

If other people (salk institute) can make their own caronavirus in a lab just like the one we're seeing now, why is it so farfetched to say it was created in a lab. Is this one of those times that we pretend means and motive and simultaneously at play?

[drutter]

Bingo! And yet right from the start the mainstream media and experts balked at the very idea that the virus could have been made or altered in a lab.

[girlsofgreen]

Yikes! Hope those spike proteins aren't contagious! Technology behind the scenes is supposedly 10 years ahead of what is released to the public...and that's what we said 20 years ago. Meanwhile, the world's been asleep for the last 50 years,. So now we're rolling up our sleeve for an unnecessary and experimental product that would be sketchy even if the makers had our best interest at heart...Don't be a paranoid conspiracy theorist...when the nanobots are finally invented they'll be to better humankind lol.

[harvestmoon299]

I heard this finding mentioned, but thanks so much for sharing the link to the study!

Can you please answer me this question: why is this not top news?

[drutter]

I'm not 100% sure on that one, but I think it's because this does not fit the agenda, or at least not yet.

[smokiethebear912]

Ruh roh, Shaggy!

[hivebuzz]

Congratulations @drutter! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

You got more than 9750 replies. Your next target is to reach 10000 replies.

_{You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP}

Support the HiveBuzz project. Vote for our proposal!

[hempy]

The ranking tool is pretty useful, and fun.
Congrats @Drutter! We'll help you get to 10k ;D

[dwinblood]

In my recent post I mentioned the following article...

Israeli People Committee’s Report Find Catastrophic Side Effects Of Pfizer Vaccine To Every System In Human Body

If you haven't seen that one it is a big deal. I wrote two posts last week one about Haiti, and one about the CDC and their special approach for testing only vaccinated people. I don't know if you saw those.

There is WAY too much info out there now. I feel like my head is going to explode. It's all a chaotic jumble in my mind at the moment.

[optimusre]

Your post is reblogged and upvoted by me. It is a good post. Thank you @drutter

[paradoxtma]

Did you miss this summary of the information in the 'infamous' report you linked?

This conclusion suggests that vaccination-generated antibody and/or exogenous antibody against S protein not only protects the host from SARS-CoV-2 infectivity but also inhibits S protein-imposed endothelial injury.

Did you skip mentioning it because it was counter to your narrative?

Did you understand anything in that report (or read it at all)? I'm asking, because what it said was NOTHING AT ALL like:

In other words, the corona of spike proteins around SarsCoV2 are responsible for transmission AND for symptoms - they are the disease!

[drutter]

I linked to the full report you're quoting from, which contains a lot more data and suggestions than I wrote about here. Everybody should read it and glean whatever they can from it, and use it to help form their own opinions. One thing it tells me is spike proteins cause Covid symptoms.

[paradoxtma]

I know you linked the full report. I appreciate the link, it made the report very easy to find, and read. You're welcome to take your own opinion from it, but...

One thing it tells me is spike proteins cause Covid symptoms.
It definitely didn't say that. That's why I asked if you had read it, and understood it. The way you misrepresented the information in that report is exactly the same thing mainstream media is constantly doing with these reports.

How can you expect anyone to find the truth by adding more lies?

[drutter]

You're calling me a liar, and I'm calling you one back. We're no further than before you left your first disingenuous comment.

[paradoxtma]

Wrong again, now I know quite a bit more about you. I won't waste any more of either of our time.

[erh.germany]

From my point of view, all theories that adhere to the germ or contagion hypothesis are questionable. The paucity of literature and suppression of critical questions about this form of "science" is systematic. The deeply rooted belief that other living beings can infect us with deadly bacteria or viruses is certainly older than even the plague. If we lived under a permanently plural Enlightenment community, there would be a lot more actuation with this contagion theory and real science would never push for consensus because otherwise it is fake science. In science, as I have understood it, consensus is not really conducive, but a decision at what point you promote something into the world as true and erect a dogma on it. Every theory should be open to questioning, because that's what theories are for. That they are always looked at anew.

Apart from that, I have consciously decided to work against this kind of inculcated conviction. My decision is that it is better for me not to believe in contagion, because it makes enemies of my fellow human beings. I don't want that. Therefore, I try to find historical records that oppose this always prevailing image of "man as the enemy of man" and tell something different, a better story. If it is told by people with a sense of humour, so much the better.

I read about Salk, the eponym of the institute at the beginning of your text. He appears in connection with the machinations that the pharmaceutical industry was already engaged in at that time. I'm not surprised that today's institute continues to promote the virus theory. Even if it seems here that they are among the "good guys".
I can't find the source where I read about him. Maybe I'll give it to you later. But probably you can find it by researching about Stefan Lanka, a German biologist and critic of the vaccine narratives. If you find my suggestion worthwhile.

Here a quote from the book I previously gave you the link:

Many vaccines also cause other diseases besides the one for which they are given. For instance, smallpox vaccine often causes syphilis, paralysis, leprosy, and cancer. (See the chapters on smallpox and plagues.) Polio shots, diphtheria toxin-antitoxin, typhoid vaccine, as well as measles, tetanus and all other shots often cause various other stages of disease such as post-vaccinal encephalitis (inflammation of the brain,) paralysis, spinal meningitis, blindness, cancer (sometimes within two years,) tuberculosis, (two to twenty years after the shot,) arthritis, kidney disease, heart disease (heart failure sometimes within minutes after the shot and sometimes several hours later.) Nerve damage and many other serious conditions also follow the injections.

When several shots are given (different vaccines) within a few days or a few weeks apart, they often trigger intensified cases of all the diseases at once, because the body cannot handle such a large amount of deadly poison being injected directly into the bloodstream. The doctors call it a new disease and proceed to suppress the symptoms.

When poison is taken by the mouth, the internal defense system has a chance to quickly eject some of it by vomiting, but when the poisons are shot directly into the body, bypassing all the natural safeguards, these dangerous poisons circulate immediately throughout the entire body in a matter of seconds and keep on circulating until all the cells are poisoned.

source: http://www.whale.to/vaccine/sf.html

[drutter]

I'm afraid you're not making any sense to me. I'm a biologist and nurse and find your conviction amusing but incredibly misguided. Spreading that kind of misinformation is truly dangerous. Please reconsider, or at least have a better understanding of the basic facts before continuing.

[erh.germany]

last comment so far:

For a better understanding: I personally am interested in what can be found off the usual main streams of information. I can understand that people strategically opt for those justifications that promise to herald the end of the Corona measures, such as that the virus escaped from a laboratory. As has now been the case with the questioning of Fauci. For you, this is perhaps a legitimate strategy and perspective? This is a question for you that I interpret from what I have read from you so far. It is not an insinuation, I would like to emphasise that much.

I don't have this perspective for the following reason: Those who believe in cultivated viruses and bioweapons ultimately believe in the virus theory (which has never been proven according to the Max Planck Institute and other sources) and in my view serve the narrative of the dangerousness of viruses of all kinds. This does nothing to alleviate the fear among people, but on the contrary continues to perpetuate it. Because it is perhaps calculated to get a significant majority on the side of finding Fauci & Co guilty as driving actors, in the hope that the Corona regime will come to an end in this way. Ostensibly, this may solve this particular problem for the time being. That is also my hope. However, I think that as far as one believes in the technical ability of artificial virus breeding, it can just go on forever that a next, "far more deadly virus" is around the corner. Based on this assumption I have made, please explain to me how a fear-free social life is supposed to evolve from this?

[erh.germany]

understanding of the basic facts

Which facts and what basics are you referring to?

Here is one of those works, from which I got some basics - a scientific investigation of the virus theory (Max-Planck-Institute) - the translation I cannot deliver to you:

https://www.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/Preprints/P125.PDF

[drutter]

That PDF is in a language I don't understand. I would love to speak German but I wasn't even good at learning other languages 30 years ago in high school. Science was my thing, and still is.

[erh.germany]

here is the second translation I did:

The history of virus research in the 20th century is usually portrayed as a continuous process, as a history of progressive revelation of virus nature (see Waterson 1978: xii; Hughes 1977: 75 ff.; for a critique of this concept see van Helvoort 1994a:187).

However, our analysis of the case study material has revealed some things that lead away from such a view of history. In particular, it was shown that the refinement and expansion of experimental means and procedures, which is generally seen as a guarantee for uninterrupted progress in the knowledge of nature, had rather led to setbacks in the period under consideration (for example, in the development of virus classification) and had deepened the gap between the contending parties in virus research.

With the "filterable" virus, something had been discovered of which, according to the concepts handed down, which had after all mostly proven themselves in the research of infectious diseases, no picture could be formed which all researchers could have shared.

Very different interpretations of the nature of this phenomenon emerged and were put forward against each other. No experimental proof for this or that concept, which all researchers would have had to recognise, could be presented by either side.

This means that the decision as to whether this or that explanation most accurately expresses the "true" nature of the virus could not be "objectified" empirically.

For me, it's quite a valuable statement, made by an established scientific institute. What do you think?

[erh.germany]

I think that "science" does not automatically equal "science" from how it is or was understood by those, who said, that real science always leaves a doubt, is open and even appreciates to be questioned and that every theory is refutable, it must be refutable in order to develop progressive understanding of scientific matters.

Here, I have translated what I found important in that paper:

INTRODUCTION

Scientific experiments are generally ascribed a compelling character,
to which the gain of consistent knowledge of nature is due.Methods for appropriate control and performance of procedures and their repetition are understood as a means of resolving differences of opinion about what may be considered the "correct" extension of scientific knowledge (see Collins 1985b: 137).

In evaluating an instrument, its reliability is seen as the key criterion by which information transformation can be made possible, the transformation of input information about the outside world into outputs that can be received by our sensory apparatus, a view cultivated in education and wherever spectacular experiments are used for demonstration purposes.

In order to do "normal" science, this understanding, which omits reflection on assumptions of reality, has proved its worth. From this perspective, the development of scientific knowledge presents itself as a process of progressive elimination of subjective perceptions in favour of measurable quantities and theoretically founded invariants, as a process in which subjective constructions are continually replaced by objective knowledge.

In contradiction to this, the newer sociology of science, when commenting on the connection between empirical laboratory practice and theoretical knowledge, works towards an understanding according to which objects of research, as they are "given", are indistinguishable from the way in which they are known.

Scientific meanings are not something already contained in the facts and immutably given to researchers, as if experiment and observation not only help to acquire practical skills for reproducing studied phenomena, but at the same time reveal to the researchers' senses otherwise hidden "information" that could be guided towards an adequate ("consistent" with the phenomena) theory-language expression (see Latour 1987: 27 and 30; Latour/Bastide 1986; Collins/Pinch 1982: 7 ff. Collins 1985a, 1985b; Krohn/Küppers 1989: 28; Woolgar 1988: 28 f.).

The development of scientific knowledge does not owe itself to the adaptation of patterns of interpretation to found phenomena. Rather, what is studied and interpreted is patterned by the researchers themselves.

Research activity is instructed by given theories and methods of a discipline, so that the results lead back to a certain extent to the preconditions of the research.

If discrepancies arise between what was observed in the experiment and what should have occurred according to the theory, efforts are made to change the experimental procedures and conditions in such a way that the objects studied behave as expected. This connection can be fixed in abstraction as a cycle; ...

So much for some basics. How is your interpretation of this text?

I will send also one passage from page 57 later on. There the paper refers to virus-theory in particular.

[erh.germany]

So it is dangerous ...
... to express my view of the world?
... to use quotes and works by people who do not fit into your view of the world?

Please explain this dangerousness to me.

You say it makes no sense to you. Okay. I can live with that. It makes sense to me and why should I keep quiet about it, since you don't keep quiet about your findings either?