‘Asymptomatic Carriers’ NOT Contagious, Study Finds

in Deep Dives9 months ago (edited)

(Source: NEJM)

The idea that asymptomatic coronavirus carriers are highly contagious is a foundational pillar of the Covid19(84) scamdemic narrative. It is the driving force behind global mandatory mask orders, the quarantining of the healthy, and indiscriminate lockdowns that decimated entire economies. It is also the driving force behind the new normal ideology being programmed into society, which sees everyone as a potential enemy, a potential carrier of the new invisible enemy of society. It is upon this ideology that the entire new technocratic totalitarian Covid19(84) normal is being built upon.

Not only that, the majority of so-called ‘Covid19’ “cases” being referenced by world health organizations and the media to hype up the ‘pandemic’ and keep people in fear are ‘asymptomatic’.

“This has been the trend across the globe. The World Health Organisation (WHO) stated that 80% of COVID-19 infections are mild or asymptomatic, while 15% are severe infections,” The News Minute reported on April 22.


If ‘asymptomatic carriers’ aren’t actually contagious, and in reality have little to no infectivity, then the entire house of cards upon which this Orwellian new technocratic Covid19(84) future is being built upon comes tumbling down. And that is exactly what a new medical study published in August found, more evidence that ‘asymptomatic carriers’ are not infectious.


The researchers focused on the case of one ‘confirmed’ asymptomatic ‘Covid19’ patient - an ‘asymptomatic carrier’ of the coronavirus - and 455 close contacts. According to its authors, the report “aims to study the infectivity of asymptomatic carriers.”

“455 contacts who were exposed to the asymptomatic COVID-19 virus carrier became the subjects of our research,” the authors wrote. The contacts were split between patients, family members and hospital staff. The average contact time of the patients and family members was four to five days. Notably, among all 455, not one single contact was infected with SARS-CoV2; none of them came down with ‘Covid19’.

The study concludes: “In summary, all 455 contacts were excluded from SARS-CoV2 infection and we conclude that the infectivity of some asymptomatic SARS-CoV2 carriers might be weak.”

You don’t say infectivity ‘might be weak’, as it was entirely nonexistent in this particular case, indicating that at least in this case, infectivity just ‘might be nonexistent’. This study appears to confirm similar findings from a number of earlier studies examined by the WHO, which stated in no uncertain terms that transmission from among ‘asymptomatic carriers’ is extremely rare.


"From the data we have, it still seems to be rare that an asymptomatic person actually transmits onward to a secondary individual,” Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove explained in June. "We have a number of reports from countries who are doing very detailed contact tracing. They’re following asymptomatic cases. They’re following contacts. And they’re not finding secondary transmission onward. It’s very rare,” she reiterated.

This admission was widely suppressed and ignored among mainstream media outlets, but later further supported by updated CDC guidelines.

In an August guideline update, the CDC shifted its recommendations to align with this understanding. The new CDC guidelines state:

If you have been in close contact (within 6 feet) of a person with a COVID-19 infection for at least 15 minutes but do not have symptoms: You do not necessarily need a test unless you are a vulnerable individual or your health care provider or State or local public health officials recommend you take one.

This is a sharp contrast to previous guidelines:

Testing is recommended for all close contacts of persons with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Because of the potential for asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic transmission, it is important that contacts of individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection be quickly identified and tested.

Now we have yet another study added to all the evidence that ‘asymptomatic carriers’ are at least for the most part not contagious, and potentially have zero infectivity at all, as the study’s findings clearly indicate based upon the one case it zeroed in on.

The reason for this could be because ‘asymptomatic carriers’ are only carrying small amounts of virus in their systems, not enough to infect others; or it could be that they aren’t even infected at all. It could also be that they have tested positive because they have some other coronavirus like the common cold...


After all, we know the tests are highly unreliable, giving out high rates of false positives, and also that they are not testing for quantity of virus, only presence. This means ‘asymptomatic carriers’ could be among the many false-positives who aren’t even infected at all, or be among those with a small enough amount of virus in their system it doesn’t make them sick.

Either way, ‘asymptomatic carriers’ are not sick, and it is disingenuous to continue to include them among the ‘Covid19’ case counts, when ‘Covid19’ is the sickness allegedly caused by the so-called virus, not mere carriers of minuscule amounts of virus in their systems. It would also be a good time for the people to begin to realize that the totalitarian technocratic new normal being built around us is being built upon a faulty foundation, and it’s being built with or without a true pandemic as its justification. It is being built upon lies and propaganda, not the available scientific evidence and medical observations, and unless we stand up and bring it down, it will be permanently with us to stay. They aren’t calling this the ‘new normal’ for nothing, and they haven’t gone to so much work building the foundation for their new technocratic future just to let it all go when the ‘threat’ is finally gone for good.

It’s time the people realize that the idea of ‘asymptomatic carriers’ as a threat to society is simply the new boogeyman, the new control mechanism to keep the masses in a state of perpetual fear, the latest pretext for the ongoing technocratic takeover of society; and just like the imminent threat of ‘terror’ following 9/11, the evidence of this latest perceived ‘threat to society’ is sorely lacking, if not entirely nonexistent.

It’s time we all realize that our friends and neighbors are not the enemy, but it is rather those who are filling our minds with fear and enslaving us who are the true enemies of humanity. If we fail to recognize this truth in time, humanity will be enslaved by the totalitarian ‘new normal’ technocracy being built up around us all.



I cannot believe we still have to argue this point, but we do. Thank you as always for the excellent work you do.

Excellent text @jasonliberty, may I translate it into Serbian?

Thanks. And absolutely! Anything to help get the truth out. I would be honored to have a post translated into a foreign tongue so it can reach a wider audience.

Thanks, really appreciate it, and keep up the good work on your end.

Also, the original News Minute link was bad, so if you don’t mind updating the post with the working link, here it is:


Updated, @jasonliberty, thank you very much.

I find this post very interesting because it offers supported and well-presented data, In my personal case, I cannot speak about my environment in my country, since I lack truthful and updated information in this regard, because where I live the data is manipulated and there is a lot of opacity in the statistics; however, what you propose makes sense. What I do know is that many people have died here, and the authorities rarely admit that it is because of Covid19, they only say that they die of pneumonia or respiratory failure. So that you can draw conclusions yourself.

Phenomenal reporting.

A great article with some good data and a rational conclusion.

Some feedback on your article:

  • Personally I'd find another pie chart other than the one you first use because this is from a study of only 215 pregnant women and could arguably be used by naysayers to say that it is not representative of the greater public due to its limited scope.

  • The quote you made from the CDC is now incorrect (possibly changed again recently) as it now reads that you need a test:

If you have been in close contact, such as within 6 feet of a person with documented SARS-CoV-2 infection for at least 15 minutes and do not have symptoms.
You need a test. Please consult with your healthcare provider or public health official. Testing is recommended for all close contacts of persons with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Because of the potential for asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic transmission, it is important that contacts of individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection be quickly identified and tested. Pending test results, you should self-quarantine/isolate at home and stay separated from household members to the extent possible and use a separate bedroom and bathroom, if available.

  • I suggest downloading that WHO interview and reposting it on 3speak. These sorts of things are going missing on a day to day basis.

  • Also, the News Minute Report on April 22 link that you provide leads to a 404 on their website. Was the article posted somewhere else?

It is SO important we are specific with the data we use now because there is so much at stake and those that are carried along with the narrative will use any excuse to invalidate our conclusions - happy to throw the baby out with the bathwater.

Anyways, great work keep it up please!

Thanks much for the feedback!

Personally I'd find another pie chart other than the one you first use because this is from a study of only 215 pregnant women and could arguably be used by naysayers to say that it is not representative of the greater public due to its limited scope.

I’m aware, and thought about this before using it, however it is almost identical with the pie chart published by The News Minute seen below based on much more data, and thus appears to be an accurate representation of the bigger picture...

Also, fixed the News Minute link, it should now work, thank you so much for brining that to my attention!

Also, regarding CDC guidelines, they are indeed updated on a regular basis, however they were indeed updated to reflect what I posted in August (when I first reported on it in early September it was still saying no need to test for close contact with asymptomatic cases). They must have more recently updated it once again to reflect the original stance!?! They continue to flip flop back and forth on so many issues, as does the WHO, governments, media, etc. What a joke, it just proves they don’t know what they’re talking about.

New data and studies continue to support and verify what us ‘conspiracy theorists’ were saying about this from the very beginning, and we have been pretty consistent in our view that this was never much worse than the flu, that numbers are overinflated, that the ‘pandemic’ is based on the fear and hype rather than facts, and that there is an underlying agenda driving this that has nothing to do with safety or public health. I think the difference between the independent media consistency being eventually solidly backed by the science and general consensus among medical community (majority of real doctors across America, and Europe), and the schizophrenic reporting and statements made by the media and so-called ‘experts’ is quite telling as to where the truth lies...

Have a great weekend and thanks again for the feedback.

Also this link is still not working - https://www.thenewsminute.com/article/large-percent-covid-19-patients-are-asymptomatic-why-concerning-123122%3famp

It's because there is %3famp on the end - I remove that and it works.

Yes I realized that, and thought I had updated the post to reflect that, and now I have done so again, and double checked, and it is currently working after the update. If it reverts back to the original link at some point in the future, there is a serious issue with Hive...

Thanks you for letting me know, after the first update I just assumed it was working, maybe it didn’t finish updating before I left the page... This is the second time I thought I had updated a Hive post due to link issues, and then when re-visiting my post, the problematic links from the original were still there as if the update hadn’t been stored on the blockchain. AFter the second update, they held, however. Very strange. I wonder if it has to do with me having spotty service at times, but I’ll keep an eye on this, as I’ve never had such issues in the past!

If it pops up again, start tagging some developers. Which frontend are you using?

I've had issues with Peakd with posts not updating properly until I refresh it twice for example.

No problem. I'm glad you've taken it on board. I respect your reporting, I'm just also aware of the bias that is created when any discrepancy is noticed by the public.

The majority do not have the ability to see the facts from the non-facts - they will simply read something and as soon as they discover one wrong thing, will decide the entire thing is false.

It's such a minefield this truther thing.

It may get worse in the future when computers are powerful enough to hack blockchain - meaning, information is literally changed simultaneously everywhere and we have no online way of tracking it.

Kind of like what's happening now - you make one reference to one website and it's either deleted or altered the next day when the agenda changes or when censorship laws get more sway.

The truth is in our hearts - we know what it is and we fight with the entirety of our beings to keep it ablaze.

Curated for #informationwar (by @aagabriel)

  • Our purpose is to encourage posts discussing Information War, Propaganda, Disinformation, and Liberty. We are a peaceful and non-violent movement that sees information as being held back by corrupt forces in the private sector and government. Our Mission.
  • Discord, website, youtube channel links here.

Delegate to the @informationwar! project and get rewarded

Excess Deaths in U S - CDC Views - September 2020 update



Yes, I do consider my work as Creative Commons, feel free to re-post anywhere just so long as you give me credit and link back to my blog. If That is not what you meant, please elaborate on your question.

Thanks for clearing that up.