What do you call the next stratosphere reached when you ascend past cognitive dissonance?
A weekly $1 tax to keep hold of clarity? Such poor usage of grammar and syntax. Back to the drawing board and room full of monkeys on typewriters for the NYT I think.
What is really revolting with this is when the articles are valuable and important for all to read..
That's why it's important to mock media organisations like NYT when necessary. They sure as hell get a kick out of mocking anything that doesn't come from their own circles, so we should do the same!
Mock? I'd rather get around their paywalls and enforced subscriptions.
Used to be a few proxy sites thta were perfect for this https://outline.com/ was one of them but they probably got too many threats and no longer work on major establishment news sites :(
sometimes just archiving the URL with the article via web.archive.org or archive.today works, sometimes you can stop the page from loading completely and capture the text before the paywall loads, I hate paywalls on good, investigative content so much!
If you haven't been censored on social media yet, you're not speaking truth to power.
In all honesty, I think I got suspended for my posting my piece on David Copperfield and his connections to Epstein, but I can't be sure because I didn't waste a minute trying to find out.
I'v seen a lot of people bitch and beg and cry when they get suspended, but they should stop and think for a moment - Do I actually want to be here in this toxic echo chamber? Twitter is a shitshow, as you know.
I fired up my alt, just to help promote Hive and Deep Dives - so, yeah I'm still there, but no FB and no YT accounts.
In times of uncertainty the printed version of the NYTimes could make a good fire starter or in times of great distress could use it for toilet paper.
I also liked the "Being evil is not evil" motto! lol
Haha, thought you would enjoy that meme of your account!
If you haven't been censored on social media yet, you're not speaking truth to power.
Very true, unless you are not on mainstream social media in the first place. Can't get censored that way lol.
In all honesty, I think I got suspended for my posting my piece on David Copperfield and his connections to Epstein, but I can't be sure because I didn't waste a minute trying to find out.
Sure, sure. I'll stick to the Russian bot theory. Don't worry, it's ok to be evil:)
Julian assange challenged the establishment how? More to the point, how come he wasn't suicided? Is he an example kept alive and paraded in the #MSM for us to steer away from?
Yes I am aware of wikispooks and I do reference it at times. I'm also very much aware of cryptome and the entire history (and feud) between them and Wikileaks. Ironically though, cryptome actually hosts Wikileaks files on their server. You can see it right here from their search feature. In fact I have used cryptome documents in some of my research articles in the past, including my my very first deep dives article.
On Assange himself, even if you don't believe he challenged the establishment (or whatever you think of him personally), I can assure you the documents do that job, for themselves. I know different people have varying opinions of him, and it's understandable that that is the case.
Our purpose is to encourage posts discussing Information War, Propaganda, Disinformation, and Liberty. We are a peaceful and non-violent movement that sees information as being held back by corrupt forces in the private sector and government. Our Mission.
its not evil to be evil 😂
I just got a new one! Back to the black background! Clarity in times of uncertainty lol.
What do you call the next stratosphere reached when you ascend past cognitive dissonance?
A weekly $1 tax to keep hold of clarity? Such poor usage of grammar and syntax. Back to the drawing board and room full of monkeys on typewriters for the NYT I think.
What is really revolting with this is when the articles are valuable and important for all to read..
That's why it's important to mock media organisations like NYT when necessary. They sure as hell get a kick out of mocking anything that doesn't come from their own circles, so we should do the same!
Mock? I'd rather get around their paywalls and enforced subscriptions.
Used to be a few proxy sites thta were perfect for this https://outline.com/ was one of them but they probably got too many threats and no longer work on major establishment news sites :(
sometimes just archiving the URL with the article via web.archive.org or archive.today works, sometimes you can stop the page from loading completely and capture the text before the paywall loads, I hate paywalls on good, investigative content so much!
Ahhaahah i like it 😆
evil is live
It's not evil to be evil. The boundaries have been shifted lol!
evil is vile
Lol, 'this guy' looks familiar hhmmm...
If you haven't been censored on social media yet, you're not speaking truth to power.
In all honesty, I think I got suspended for my posting my piece on David Copperfield and his connections to Epstein, but I can't be sure because I didn't waste a minute trying to find out.
I'v seen a lot of people bitch and beg and cry when they get suspended, but they should stop and think for a moment - Do I actually want to be here in this toxic echo chamber? Twitter is a shitshow, as you know.
I fired up my alt, just to help promote Hive and Deep Dives - so, yeah I'm still there, but no FB and no YT accounts.
In times of uncertainty the printed version of the NYTimes could make a good fire starter or in times of great distress could use it for toilet paper.
I also liked the "Being evil is not evil" motto! lol
Haha, thought you would enjoy that meme of your account!
Very true, unless you are not on mainstream social media in the first place. Can't get censored that way lol.
Sure, sure. I'll stick to the Russian bot theory. Don't worry, it's ok to be evil:)
Now i'm just nitpicking.
Julian assange challenged the establishment how? More to the point, how come he wasn't suicided? Is he an example kept alive and paraded in the #MSM for us to steer away from?
Have you heard of https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Cryptome or https://wikispooks.com/wiki/John_Robles ?
Sorry for being a cunt today. REEEEE!
Yes I am aware of wikispooks and I do reference it at times. I'm also very much aware of cryptome and the entire history (and feud) between them and Wikileaks. Ironically though, cryptome actually hosts Wikileaks files on their server. You can see it right here from their search feature. In fact I have used cryptome documents in some of my research articles in the past, including my my very first deep dives article.
On Assange himself, even if you don't believe he challenged the establishment (or whatever you think of him personally), I can assure you the documents do that job, for themselves. I know different people have varying opinions of him, and it's understandable that that is the case.
LOL with the REEEEEE!
Curated for #informationwar (by @aagabriel)
Delegate to the @informationwar! project and get rewarded