Hmmm, yeah, that isn't how a commons works.
If I add something to a pool that goes 50% to the top 20 curators, they get 50% of it, and the other 50% will be spread among the lesser people.
You, being two of the top 20, that I know of, would get 1/10th of that first 50%, if my math is correct.
Ergo, if you flag something for 100hbd, 50 would be split by the top 20, and 5hbd would be for your 2 shares.
The thing I always appreciated about math is that it is the same for everybody every time.
It is also either right, or wrong.
Are you saying this math is wrong?
Your concept of thinking those with the least amount of stake should get the most rewards is flawed.
That isn't what I have asked for.
I've asked that those that can take out the most, take out less.
Thereby raising the bottom and spreading the distribution wider.
Hopefully juicing the network effects of mining this way.
Why would someone invest to take less with the more they spend?
As long as they don't buy more than 1000mv they get to play at the same level as everybody else, presuming we agree that that is a good initial setting for reaping the pool.
If they want to invest more, good for them.
But, kicking over the apple cart at the beginning of the day and grabbing as many apples as one can carry is hardly a 'good' way to spread out the daily apple bounty, imo.
That makes absolutely no sense, but feel free to create a fork like that, you can also donate your tokens if you like.
I hope it doesn't come to that, but if it must then so be it.
Care to enlighten me as to why you take ~25% of what is getting shared with me?
You should create your own fork where those with no stake earn 90% of the rewards. That way if you want more rewards, instead of investing you can just make a new account! I'm sure it would be really popular.