Going crypto legit

in LeoFinance3 years ago

Back in March I wrote a post on legitimacy and how it is the community that legitimizes behavior.

The other day, Trump questioned the legitimacy of Bitcoin.

“Bitcoin, it just seems like a scam,”

And then contradicted himself.

“I don’t like it because it’s another currency competing against the dollar. I want the dollar to be the currency of the world. That’s what I’ve always said.”

If Bitcoin is a scam, how can it compete with something like the US dollar?

This all comes down to the process of legitimization, which requires some kind of authority to make something "legal", but don't question who that authority may be. Legitimization doesn't have to come from a centralized entity, it can come through the normalization of thought or behavior of a group, a community. In the case of Bitcoin, the thing that makes it not a scam is that a growing community of users legitimize it through their investment and usage.

Because of its not a scamminess, it has the potential to "compete against the dollar", which further legitimizes it to the point that for instance, El Salvador can pass a bill to make it legal tender in their country, effectively legitimizing it as legal tender globally in the same move. Interestingly, El Salvador has used the US Dollar as its fiat currency since 2001, meaning they have now directly pitted Bitcoin against the Dollar at the local level.

Bitcoin is now, legit.

As more countries start to make similar moves and potentially expand the scope out to other or maybe all crypto currencies, this further legitimizes crypto, but only from the sense of the centralized authority, as it has already been seen as legitimate by crypto enthusiasts for years.

Interestingly, while most people globally still laugh at the idea of crypto and the people who back it, much of what they/we have predicted is coming to pass. This doesn't just legitimize crypto, but also puts pressure to legitimize the community itself. When governments are worried about Bitcoin becoming a global reserve currency and stripping away their power, the community that backs it are becoming powerful.

The current economy and conditions has been developed through hundreds of years of decisions to increasingly put the power in the hands of a few to the point that challenging that economic power seemed a fool's errand. In thirteen years, fools have not only made the attempt, but built enough capability to threaten the modern economy at its core. What will thirteen more years bring to the argument?

But, they are looking to further legislate cryptos to maintain control of the economy, but doing so further legitimizes them and in time, will result in the further (and potentially speed) erosion of exactly what they are trying to protect.

Not only this, the governments who are struggling to get access to economic value from companies due to global accounting practices, will be vying for the wealth generated on decentralized blockchains to be spent locally. This results in them having to tread a fine line, as while they want control of the value of the assets, they also need people with those assets. If they overcontrol, the people with will find locations that are more welcoming of them and their crypto.

What is actually changing globally is the paradigm of who has economic control, with the lie that it is in the hands of the governments being perpetuated for years. Control has always been in the hands of the consuming masses through the decisions they make and, that includes what "tokens of trade" they choose to legitimize in the marketplace. If the demand for fiat currencies drop and the demand for crypto increases, the digital economy not only takes economic weight, it also disperses ownership of those currencies across the entire userbase, fundamentally changing the functioning of economies and therefore, the societies that enable them.

The kinds of social movements that we have seen in the past have shifted culture, but have been slow and largely ineffectual in changing the makeup of the economy or affecting the increasing wealth gaps. The reason is that despite all the protests, they are appeals for change to the same authorities that benefit from the economy being as it is now. With crypto, rather than appealing to change laws and institutional habit, it is targeting the source of control itself, the economy.

Not only this, it hasn't done it with some kind of attack or protest, it has done it using a peaceful, opt-in process, where starting from nothing, it has increasingly brought people into the fold, with no force, no ultimatum. Because of this, while no one is forced to change, people will eventually have to make a decision on which economy they think is going to be the most valuable for them and this decision will be made more clear, once userbase increases in crypto and businesses follow the money, as they always do. Businesses don't care what that money is called, as long as they can use it to represent value and have purchasing power with it. It is the same for all users - no one cares what their currency is called, as long as they can use it to trade.

We are entering into interesting times in regards to the economy, as there are so many disruptions that are taking place simultaneously, including the massive increase in supply of money in the traditional economy, which will eventually lead to high inflation. This will put more social pressure on governments, as well as force the governments to find ways to rein-in the inflation rates, leading to more disillusioned people who are questioning the legitimacy of the centralized authorities, and the way they manage control people.

The questions being raised are not going to go away and as more people build their financial literacy as they opt-in to alternative economies, an increasing number of people are not only going to have the understanding, but also the economic capabilities to pressure the authorities to provide answers, or risk being made illegitimate by society.

Taraz
[ Gen1: Hive ]

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

Sort:  

Oh dear, as interesting as interesting times are I can't say I'm big on some types of interesting times and this is one of the ones I'm not sure about XD

I did enjoy the Pratchett book of that name

great news yesterday at 0.00 midnight the law was approved by congress,
and here we go fortunately we are in front of this, and see of first hand .

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

Keep us posted on what happens with it

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

It has always been people who give money value. If people decide something is worth trading for, whether it is gold, Bitcoin, wampum, or tulip bulbs, then that stuff has value. If people decide it does not, that value evaporates. Only human beings have immutable, inherent value, and our choices define which objects have derivative, changeable value.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

Exactly. Yet it seems that people have forgotten this and believe it is a central bank that grants value to money.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

Very well written.
I'm curious to see what is going to be the outcome of all this.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

Yes, it is going to likely get messy.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

I think these smaller states are going to start toppling like dominoes. Nobody wants to be last to accept bitcoin as legal tender.
Only real question, is who's going to be first with Eth, LTC etc.

Perhaps they won't need to do the alts individually and instead, just create gateways. Interoperability has always been one of the value points and this would allow for all chains to be able to generate value, and transfer it anywhere on the world, across any network.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

I'm thinking from a tax perspective. Governments could still get silly and consider alts to be assets, for CGT purposes. It would get messy and dumb, but 'messy and dumb' is their home turf.

Yes, I assume this is what they will do too. The problem being, the more they screw up, how many people will keep supporting it, instead of finding ways around it?

I literally looked into how to gain citizenship to El Salvador last night. Not because I would want to move there, but just to see what it takes just in case my crypto becomes worth millions. As they aren't taxing selling BTC if this passes that is a huge motivation to move wealth there vs selling in a country that wants to take a large chunk of my gains.

If I looked into with my small holdings you know that others who have substantial gains will take a very serious look at it.

BTW, 5 years of living there before you can gain citizenship...they need to drop that to 12 months and I bet a massive flow of wealth goes into their Country as BTC millionaires flock there to avoid the massive tax bills they will be facing.

Invest 3 BTC in a crypto business in El Salvador and get permanent residency.
That's what the President said on the Twitter call this morning.

105K for a citizenship.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

Permanent residency, not citizenship.

Interesting, as there are lots of reports of it being citizenship. Permanent residency makes more sense at this point though.

Mobility of wealth is going to be a massive change, as countries are going to have to compete for citizens, like they compete for companies now. Who will have the best offers?

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

That is pretty funny about Trump contradicting himself. I am so glad that I don't have to hear about that sort of thing on a daily basis anymore. Even though I know it is still happening. You make some really good points here about how they are basically legitimizing BTC and other cryptos by doing all of the things they think are going to make them fail. That is also really awesome about El Salvador. I look forward to seeing what kind of domino effect that might have.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

Whichever way they turn to control now, they are going to run into complications, either technical or social. The funny thing is that while individuals get to opt-in to crypto - the governments themselves will be forced.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

Soon

As always :)

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

I read this article on Momday.

Digital currencirs are here: What does this mean for the new finacial world order?

South Africa got a big wake-up call on the mainstreaming of digital currencies last week when the South African Reserve Bank (SARB) announced that it would be conducting a yearlong feasability study for its own general-purpose retail central bank digital currency (CBDC).

Good news indeed, but there's more.

The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) recently found that 86% of central banks are now exploringthe benefits and drawbacks of CBDCs, nearly 60% are experimenting with their own CBDCs and 14% are already piloting projects to deploy CBDCs.
Credit goes to my newspaper , The Daily Maverick.

So yes, the onslaught has begun in earnest as not only is crypto legitimised, but the regulators will make sure that they control things to enrich the existing establishment. The Taxman awaiteth.

Just stay away from CBDCs :D

Hive it is mate, nothing else :)

Legitimization doesn't have to come from a centralized entity, it can come through the normalization of thought or behavior of a group, a community.

Absolutely.

Interestingly, while most people globally still laugh at the idea of crypto and the people who back it, much of what they/we have predicted is coming to pass.

Here's a fun fact:

14 percent of americans own crypto.png

And it's a very similar number in other countries. That means between 1–2 people you meet has a little crypto in their back pocket.

Hard to argue with that. 😎

It would be interesting to see what kinds of percentages there are in various demographics. I would suspect that in the richest percentiles, they don't have much crypto.

Hmmm... You're probably right. And if you are, I think crypto's volatility and unpredictability are the reasons for that.

When people have less money they tend to look at a bigger risk/reward ratio as a way to get somewhere they want to go (financially). Whereas people with enormous wealth are already at or close to where they want to be and generally feel more inclined to "protect" their wealth and "manage" it than to make an enormous gain if it's pitted against the risk of an enormous loss.

Plus, a 20–40% loss on a $100M dollar investment is a YUUUUGGGEE chunk of change to lose. Lol. That's a few lifetimes' of cash for a normal person.

It would be interesting to see what the ratio is.

Trump is not stupid - the statement that he gave out just confirms that. The way I see it, we can see both sides of Trump - first, Trump the politician, who says that the USD is the greatest currency out there and he wants it to be the strongest in the world, and Trump the businessman - who contradicts himself because he acknowledges the fact that BTC is and will be USD's biggest rival currency out there.

Do you think he owns any?

I am 100% sure that he owns some - but I am not very sure that he even acknowledges it! :D I guess he has around 100 managers around him running his finances, so I would say that for sure atleast a dozen of them are in charge of crypto-related investments

It seems like so many of the people who comprise the "powers-that-be" are also buying bitcoin as a backup plan. There isn't really any organized opposition to bitcoin in the west it feels like, just individuals hating on it. I don't see what would actually stop it from being "legit" at this point

There is so much opportunity in it, that most people with half a brain are going to hedge - those that have half a brain and aren't are using the other half for their thinking.

Good insight.

Cheers

Congratulations @tarazkp! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

You got more than 65500 replies.
Your next target is to reach 66000 replies.

You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

I honestly don't see Bitcoin competing with the US Dollar. Bitcoin, a digital asset can not render the Dollar useless entirely. I don't just think it's possible, it's not a competition.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

It doesn't have to compete on the day to day, but it can compete as a reserve currency - the other thousands of tokens will do the rest.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

If it’s a scam, but it competes against the dollar, then is the dollar a scam?

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta