Serious question, what about that video makes you believe a weapon is being fired from that man? He isn't even looking at Charlie until the moment before you hear the shot.
Let me be clear: this entire thing stinks, and Robinson does feel like a patsy.
But there's videos from further away from the tent where you hear the shot, and it clearly sounds like a supersonic crack from a rifle.
I've done plenty of shooting, and immediately knew a rifle was used.
You would not get that sound from a guy on the ground near Charlie with some kind of concealed small gun.
Also how would he aim this concealed gun at Charlie? It just doesn't add up to this guy being the killer.
In the videos of Robinson climbing off the roof the rifle is visible. He even drops it(or just the scope) when he does the high jump to the ground.
The rifle does not disassemble, that is correct.
However they did find a screw-driver on the roof, and I THINK they're implying that he removed the scope before climbing off the roof. It doesn't make a lot of sense.
In the photos I've seen it could easily be a composite/polymer chassis, or wood painted black.
There are claims that he had it inside his pants/shirt while walking funny in some of the videos. However, that could be he is injured after that at least 14 ft drop.
I don't know if we have footage of him actually entering the school. It's possible he placed the rifle on the roof somewhere ahead of the event too.
Another issue with sneaking it in concealed in his clothes: a large scope like that could lose it's zero if it's being pulled on by clothing. At least enough to make a first shot a slight miss. Also when you zero a sight/scope you're typically doing it for a certain distance, and if you're closer or further than that distance you learn the appropriate 'hold-off': a spot in the reticle outside of the zero/center that you line up on the target to compensate for distance/height/wind.
This is why sniper teams usually have a spotter next to the shooter with his own optic. He sees where the round impacts, so that the shooter can adjust his hold-off based on the spotters info vs the sniper's stand-off.
The shot itself isn't difficult or impossible for a decent shooter, but that's not including the stress of firing on a human above a crowd of that many people. A hunter would be stressed about it, and nerves affect accuracy.
It would be a lot more believable to me if he had fired more than one shot.
But it just so happens that the first shot would have immediately sent everyone moving, and it wouldn't have been successful.
It does stink, there's things that don't make sense. But I don't think the guy in that video is shooting a gun.
I appreciate you providing a well informed comment. Other than James Bond Q level gear, there's no way the Brown Shirt spook could have fired a palm gun with any hope of accuracy. A camera wirelessly linked to his goggles with an HUD display of the sight picture from the palm gun is not particularly difficult to make today. We've had similar tech for decades in tanks and planes, so it's not incredible for spooks to have much smaller sight systems suitable for such a covert palm gun. Google lens has been around for years, and spooks have much better gear than what is available commercially.
However, I think it's AI, and don't think the Brown Shirt spook is real. I want proof it's fake, and I think that shouldn't be beyond expectation because there are a lot of cameras taking video of that event, which can establish a consensus of real video that proves this video is fake. Also the analysis of that video can possibly locate the actual shooter. But, that doesn't have anything to do with Tyler Robinson, who couldn't have shot Charlie Kirk without the rifle the FBI says he used (unless they're hiding some other weapon that was used from us).
In the pics of Robinson going up the stairs, his pants are so tight you can clearly see his cell phone in his front pocket, and that's less than 1/2" thick. There is absolutely no way he had that rifle in his pants, even with the stock separated from the action and barrel. It would print visibly, just like his cell phone. Whether polymer or wood, the stock is one piece, ~30" long, ~6" wide at the butt, and ~2" at the termination of the forend. It's a long action Mauser with a 24" barrel, making the barrel attached to the action at least 30" long. With the scope attached to the action, it would also be well over 6" wide, too. According to his booking pics, he's 6' tall, 72". His backpack isn't 30" high and couldn't hold either piece of the rifle. Even if he had a hole in the backpack from which the barrel and forend of the stock could protrude, and stuffed them down his pants, they'd print. He's wearing tight pants. The forend is at least 2" thick at it's termination, and if that pack is ~18" tall (my daypack is ~14" tall), both the forend and the barrel would protrude >12" down his leg. They would be obvious. He neither had anything large enough to be that solid stock nor the barrel and attached action when he dropped off the roof. He had something much shorter, about the length of a scope (but thinner), perhaps, and some cloth like a towel.
WE don't. The FBI does. The Losee Center has just been extensively remodeled, and has brand new HD cameras that cover every place where Robinson is said to have been on the grounds of the center, including the roof, where the FBI claims he fired the shot from. The FBI should have video of every moment Robinson was on the grounds of the Losee Center, including where he posted up to fire from. The video of him running across the roof is deliberately cut so that it doesn't show him getting up, changing clothes, or breaking down the rifle, despite there should be video of him doing those things because the new cameras cover the entire roof. The pics in the OP are screencaps from surveillance video that show him walking up the stairs to the roof. One of the most suspicious things about the pics in the OP are that they seem to be deliberately chosen NOT to show Robinson's face clearly. What they do show clearly are his tightly clothed legs and upper body (his shirt is close fitting too). There is no rifle printing under his clothes, and it wouldn't fit inside the backpack even broken down into two pieces.
It occurs to me (and not only me) that the weird claim he changed clothes multiple times is an attempt to explain away people wearing different clothes in the surveillance footage, because Robinson wasn't alone and the FBI wants him to be a lone assassin. That adds to the suspicious screencaps that don't show Robinson's face clearly, and the fact he doesn't have a Mauser long action .30-06 with him when he goes up to the roof, nor when he jumps down. The barrel and attached action would be almost half his body length, which the cloth and item he did have was nowhere near. What he was carrying in hand appeared to be able to fit in his backpack, in fact, so less than ~18" long.
IMG source - Odysee.com - World Alternative Media
Here's the pic the FBI provided of Grandpa's '06, they claim was the assassination weapon. You'll notice right away the scope is mounted wrong, and more likely to blacken a shooter's eye than hit anything he aimed at. However the barrel is 24" long, and threads into the action ~1" forward of the front ring clamping the scope to the action. It's half the overall length of the rifle, which makes the stock >30" long, and it's one solid piece, as you can see. The Mauser long action also adds at least 6" to the barrel length. That's not what he had in hand when he jumped off the roof. What he had was not anything as wide as the action or the butt of the stock, and not as long as either action or stock.
Yes. I typically sight in an '06 for hunting hereabouts at 200 yards, because then it shoots ~1 1/2" high at 100 yards, and ~2" low at 300 yards (with slight variations depending on ammunition), making every well placed shot in the ~6" kill zone on a deer from zero to 300 yards without even adjusting for ballistics. That would be about perfect for the range at which the FBI claims Charlie Kirk was shot, too.
You're absolutely correct that if he detached the scope there is no way he'd shoot accurately. A head shot <200 yards isn't particularly difficult. But even just detaching the barrel and action with the scope still attached from the stock would negatively affect accuracy. I can print a 1" group at 200 yards with a rifle that can do it. One of the things I learned to do was 'bed' actions tightly into stocks, and free float barrels, to eliminate vibration/harmonics from variable movement of the stock relative to the barrel where they're in contact, and get rifles to shoot that accurately. Making that shot after detaching and re-attaching the scope is almost impossible - but even just breaking down the action from the stock would make that shot unlikely, because it wouldn't be possible to precisely reattach them to exactly the same position and tightness the rifle was sighted in with, which would add a minute of angle or two to the group at that range. An inch or two at 100 yards, and that shot was ~140 yards IIRC, spreading the group even wider. I would never voluntarily do that hunting, for example. I don't think any of that matters though, because looking at the pics of him climbing the stairs, there is no place for him to have that rifle with him, and he didn't drop off the roof with it either.
Thanks!
A sophisticated likely state-sponsored spook could have a compact heads-up-display weapon for assassination, agreed.
However, it would almost certainly be a smaller caliber or a flechette-style projectile. But also, I would almost expect a .30 to make it through the neck at the relatively-short range from the roof. Though there were claims that his spine got trauma, but that could be from cavitation or even just shock to the brain and nerves concentrated that close to the impact.
I could see 5.56 or 5.45 not making it through the neck, and that was what I assumed this was going to be before they announced it.
5.45 in particular was known as the poison bullet because of it's tendency to enter the body and spall to damage internal organs, but 5.56 is similar because of it's speed and relatively low mass. Also why it's not the best hunting round in forests I would assume.
But to me, I don't know if the video is real or fake. I just don't see an obvious execution there from that guy.
There's also the fact the state actor would be conscious of the sheer amount of cameras in multiple directions there near Charlie.
There was an above-the-shoulder camera mounted at the back of that tent that was removed 5 mins after the shooting, and before police secured the scene.
That camera likely has footage that would prove more regarding this guy as I'm sure he's in frame.
To go through all the effort of having that guy there to do it, and then be caught on camera seems counter-productive UNLESS you had guaranteed cooperation from local authorities/federal in Utah.
The text messages from the alleged shooter are also quite strange, but they could be written in an obtuse way in an attempt to clear a network of other people involved with Robinson.
Long before this there have been lots of murders involving trans individuals associated with online networks such as 09A:Order Of Nine Angles.
Also he could be trying to clear his "lover".
I agree with almost everything you say here. Candace Owens says she has the footage of that camera behind Kirk when he was shot. However, on video shared by @manorvillemike below, it does in fact show the Brown Shirt spook moving just as he does in the video in the OP, for whatever that's worth.
Edit: according to Candace Owens, there is no exit (or wound of any kind) on the back of Charlie Kirk's neck after he has been shot. There is no way a .30-06 would not leave an exit wound, nor a 5.56 or other high speed rifle round. They just pack too much energy, as the video shared by @manorvillemike shows when they shoot a ballistic dummy head with and '06, and it literally explodes.
However, that isn't from the entry wound. The entry wound from a .30-06 is .30" across, because the bullet hasn't begun to dump it's energy by deforming and impacting the mass of the target. It is the rapid expansion of bullets after they enter the target that creates a significant wound channel, and exit wounds are much larger than entry wounds for soft pointed hunting ammunition. However, metal jacketed armor piercing ammunition does not expand and create a large wound channel, dumping it's energy in the target, because it is constrained by the metal jacket of the bullet. Full metal jacketed bullets are designed not to deform so that they can penetrate body armor or other impediments and penetrate the target. The exit wound of a jacketed bullet can leave the same size hole it creates on entrance, unlike soft point hunting ammo. Even a much cleaner hole in you than that made by hunting ammunition is a significant wound, and can be fatal if it pierces the right parts.
Only something as small as a .22 rimfire could potentially not leave an exit wound in a target as thin as a human neck. .22LR bullets pass right through rats, for example, and might well pass through a human neck as well, if they didn't impact the spine. I've used .22LR to kill downed cattle, and .22 bullets certainly pass through cow skulls to kill them instantly with a well placed shot right behind the ear. Every high powered rifle round would similarly pass through the neck, and even an armor piercing full metal jacketed round, or a .22 short, would have killed by rupturing the jugular as it did Charlie Kirk's. However, almost every round I can think of would leave an exit wound, passing through the neck - except possibly something as low power as the .22 short.
So full metal, small hole in and small hole out ?
Yes. Soft point hunting ammo has a partially jacketed bullet, with a lead, or other very soft metal, tip. The soft point is so that the bullet deforms and gets very wide, causing it to create as large a wound channel as possible, and dumping it's energy into the target. The jacketed base is to keep the base intact, connected to the mushrooming tip, and doesn't allow the bullet to fragment into many small pieces which are difficult to remove from the meat. A fully jacketed bullet isn't allowed to expand at all, and if it isn't diverted or stopped by bone (or pass through armor), it just passes through the target, making as small an exit hole as the entrance hole.
Edit: I just found information that the bullet has been found. It not exit Charlie Kirk's neck, but was stopped by his spine:
This was posted by someone named Kolvet, that is described as a producer for TPUSA, who was quoting the surgeon that worked on Charlie Kirk after the shooting.
I would certainly concur with the assessment that it is a miracle that the .30-06 bullet didn't create an exit wound. The entire narrative regarding this event is definitely a string of assertions that require believing in miracles.
https://www.sgtreport.com/2025/09/evidences-charlie-kirks-killing-was-a-professional-hit-job/
More incite into the assassination..
Part of above post https://theduran.com/evidences-charlie-kirks-killing-was-a-professional-hit-job/
This is BIG as big as 9/11 if true (and I have little doubt it isn't ) Israel's Mossad and our CIA deep state are behind this. But they are getting sloppy. Looks like an inside job all the way. Right down to his trusted security detail IMO.
Taking out Charlie does 2 things / gets him off Israel's back & divides us more than we are ...
Keep up your good investigating to awaken others //
This is the post on X I wanted to send you first. ~~~ embed:1968415728802976128?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1969054789376901189%7Ctwgr%5E61ab8ae26dd55260feb5928ff4f499c76f4d89a2%7Ctwcon%5Es3_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.sgtreport.com%2F2025%2F09%2Fmore-evidence-that-tyler-robinson-was-not-the-shooter-but-just-the-patsy%2F twitter metadata:MlNtYXJ0c2tpfHxodHRwczovL3R3aXR0ZXIuY29tLzJTbWFydHNraS9zdGF0dXMvMTk2ODQxNTcyODgwMjk3NjEyOHw= ~~~
Lot of info and thoughts in the tread of this post.
In the pics and video the FBI has released they claim shows Tyler Robinson climbing to the roof and jumping off the roof with a Mauser long action .30-06 scoped rifle, I see no rifle. That lack of a rifle completely disproves the claim Robinson shot Kirk. My belief is that you are correct about Robinson being a patsy to blame to murder of Charlie Kirk on, and that murder was committed by someone else, for completely different reasons, and the FBI appears to be covering for that killer by making false claims that are obviously disproved by the very pics and video they claim are evidence of Robinson's guilt.
I'll have at that link presently.
So non-FMJ or ball ammo is actually banned by military use under "war crimes", or so I've been told.
Most guys who shot the M855 or Green Tip 5.56 in combat have said they didn't think of it as a great people-killing round, but that it worked well shooting at people inside of vehicles. The claim was that it would often travel through people.
And yes the soft-expansion of a round into flesh is ideal for causing more damage, but even with FMJ 5.56 the ammo is known to 'tumble'when meeting resistance like flesh.
If something moving fast changes direction there is going to be a lot of energy imparted from that. That's considered a feature of the intermediate rounds as far as I know. There is also papers from the switch from 7.62 NATO that deal with the upsides of the switch including more shots carried by each person.
Better accuracy/less recoil.
But also the doctrine that wounded casualties are preferable to kills because soldiers then have to assist them and get them back to the medical facilities where they become more of a cost on the enemy once again through resources used to heal them.
But that's 5.56, and this is .30-06. Oh and the switch from .30-06 to .308/7.62 NATO I BELIEVE was done assuming .308 was more accurate out at longer ranges, and that was preferable to the extra weight/speed.
The idea of a round with that much weight moving that fast, and not exiting is insane to me. The only partial-explanation I've heard(with no evidence of it) is that he was wearing a possible plate/vest, and the bullet ricocheted off of that into his jugular vein. That's a maybe, but I don't know enough to say that's likely or unlikely.
What I do know is that it was weird for that guy close to Charlie's team to say that Charlie's bones were so strong it stopped the bullet that could have injured other people. I think he called Charlie Superman too.
That's a very weird statement.
Every time we have these monumental events in the USA there is an inherent tendency for us to distrust the official story we are given, but then there's almost always conflicting evidence and testimony followed by all sorts of strange anomalies.
For example: Oklahoma City bombing, 9/11(it's like a labyrinth of rabbit-holes inside of spaghetti), and more recently the Vegas Shooting.
We never get the full picture, but often we also don't have someone who is going to trial. If this kid ends up dead that'll be the final thing I need to say they're lying to us, period. Oh and I almost forget about Epstein, funny that.
You are completely correct in every point.
There is a reason we're subsumed in controversy during these events, and that's because we're ruled by gangsters that use blackmail to control child molesters in political office to profit from our suffering. These events are all committed by that mob for that reason.
It's such a mess with so many factions involved that it's almost impossible to target which one is behind which fuck-up in any given event.
Even Charlie Kirk himself, to me was an instrument of the criminal organizations.
Whether he knew that, or found out later is debatable.
And I do think he did a lot of good, and tried to be real and righteous about his organization's mission.
Of course, lately it's become a lot more acceptable to move off-script for many republicans. Hell, even Tucker Carlson is saying some wild things now.
I don't trust Tucker at all, but sometimes he says things that I think are correct.
And that's part of the problem. There's money to be made massaging the truth, and making sure it doesn't go in a certain direction. You don't even have to lie most of the time, just omit or stay off some subjects.
Charlie's audience is the reason he had to start speaking about some of these things because in most cases we are to the right of the pundits.
Same is true of Tucker. Candace Owens, idk. It's hard to say with her because she says some things that just sound crazy lol.
Every successful lie must contain a kernel of truth. The lack of such kernels has been the cause of the collapse of so many propaganda narratives lately, and I think Carlson has been tasked to recover some of the market by completely reversing himself on 9/11. It's been a generation now, and the fruits of that astounding fraud have been resown and reharvested, the perps mostly dead or still beyond account.
I don't trust anyone, no matter how crazy they sound, because my understanding of the reality extant makes them look staid and respectable. Emmanuel's husband was one of the craziest allegations Candace made, and she's withstood legal challenges to the point where I consider it all but proved true now.
Christian Zionism is what Charlie was paid by Zionists to promote, and his late epiphany and challenging that dogma was, as you point out, necessary to keep TPUSA useful because only psychopathic narcissists were capable of denying that Trump is compromised, Bondi and her groveling toadies Patel and Bongino are blatantly lying about Epstein's operations, and ignoring that threat to the JudeoChristian hasbara had to be addressed or it would be completely disregarded.
But Charlie didn't consider how his own murder could completely obscure it, and that is what is being done. However, any that do not now abandon that dogma don't matter because they're simply incapable of rational thought given the glaring proof it is utterly false. Many former MAGA guys have faced the truth, and Charlie's murder is what has dislodged them from their false belief. Because I think blackmail is one of the most potent mechanisms corrupting America and the West, Kirk's assassination is ripping the cover away because I have never seen such a flimsy plaster as the absolute BS narrative we've been handed about Charlie Kirk's murder in my life.
Again, only psychopathic narcissists could think such feeble Machiavellian tactics couldn't fail, only because their certainty they can't fail is absolute and completely deranged. Anyone capable of independent thought that takes more than a cursory look at the murder cannot fail to see the FBI is full of crap, and the more and longer they look, the more crap they will plainly see. I think this is the clinal boundary that the majority of people will transcend to grasp we are at war and losing because we're depending on our enemy to defend us.