Coronavirus: True Story of 5G

lighteye (75)in Deep Dives • 4 years ago (edited)

[Текст на српском] You really can’t ignore screaming conspiracists who are triggered every time someone mention 5G network. Dangerous nonsense about ‘the deadly radiation’ which has caused COVID-19 promoted by ‘influencers’ like David Icke, is hiding two important globalists’ aims…

The first one is obvious: it is an attempt to prevent China in taking over globalists’ project. Western globalization project is not in decline, but in full collapse. A fierce economic, trade, cyber and propaganda war is raging, with coronavirus hoax as one of the elements. But the most important aim in this phase are Chinese IT corporations, Huawei and ZTE before all. Why?

Setting the standards

We have to remember that corporations are divided into three levels. Lowest level are corporations who actually produce something. For example Mercedes, Leica or Foxconn. Second tier would be corporations who are developing concepts. Apple corporation would be the best example in this segment. The top level are the corporations which set standards. And there you have Huawei.

In the case of great economic disasters, lowest tiers, producing corporations suffer the heaviest blow, and top tiers usually are rising to the level of monopoly. Therefore, Western globalists does not choose the means to stop Huawei.

‘Expert’ bias

‘Experts’ were always a favorite tool of the globalists, since a great deal of sheeple tends to believe the ‘official sources’. Let’s look at their proven method…

A criminaly biased article published at www.electricsense.com titled 5G Radiation Dangers – 11 Reasons To Be Concerned, is quite a good example. There you can find things like these:

Thousands of studies link low-level wireless radio frequency radiation exposures to a long list of adverse biological effects, including:

DNA single and double strand breaks

oxidative damage

disruption of cell metabolism

increased blood brain barrier permeability

melatonin reduction

disruption to brain glucose metabolism

generation of stress proteins
Let’s not also forget that in 2011 the World Health Organization (WHO) classified > radio frequency radiation as a possible 2B carcinogen.

For a starters, citing numerous terrible sounding health disorders is NOT an evidence of its cause. Putting this in a context of 5G without any evidence is pure manipulation. Then, you will always in these texts see ‘a high frequency danger’, which is still far below the dangerous (ionizing) radiation…

5G spectrum-photo_2020-05-18_14-37-55.jpg

…but also never mention how low is the energy coupled with that high frequency. So, let’s see this statement little closer:

Thousands of studies link low-level wireless radio frequency radiation exposures to a long list…

In science, it is not enough to verbally ‘link’ something to something else, but it is necessary to establish certain causal relationship. If those ‘thousands of studies’ have established a certain causal relationship, you would have a separate source of excessive mortality in the sites like https://www.worldometers.info/. You have to see the data and ask: What those ‘thousands of studies’ can show? Where can we see that dreadful rise of brain cancer? On the Ookla interactive map we can see that USA and South Korea has the most extensive coverage with 5G network of all World countries. So, we must expect a sharp rise in brain cancers and gliomas in USA, right?

So, where are all those terrible brain cancers and gliomas in the last 30 years?

Nothing. “Thousands of studies” is simply a scaremongering phrase with no truth in it at all. It simply isn’t the truth. Here is one video in which you can see a rare thing – the opposite views of experts presented in a fairly short and clear manner:

Duration: 14:51

Could not believe that I’m ever going to use corporate media sources, but there it is… Let’s go a little further into this ‘expert’ piece:

Let’s not also forget that in 2011 the World Health Organization (WHO) classified radio frequency radiation as a possible 2B carcinogen.

Keyword is ‘possible’. And author didn’t bother to explain a ‘tiny’ bit of fact that 2B carcinogens are – for example – pickle vegetables and coffee!

Aside of all that, Bill Gates’ WHO is obviously brimming with experts…

“The plans to beam highly penetrative 5G milliwave radiation at us from space must surely be one of the greatest follies ever conceived of by mankind. There will be nowhere safe to live.”
— Olga Sheean former WHO employee and author of ‘No Safe Place’

…who does not even know that 5G cannot penetrate anything. They work with so low energy that you get more radiation from your lightbulb. That’s why you will need open space to the antenna, and penetrating 4G to establish a connection if you don’t have open space. Here is another reasonable explanation what 5G is:

Duration: 14:58

Influencers

What the ‘experts’ does not catch in their network, there are centralized social platforms to scoop the sheeple. They have specialists who mastered the art of bullshitting by revealing one obvious truth to sell you three unspeakable lies. One of the best in business is David Icke, authority on the things he has been educated, and that is exactly – nothing! You may consider him a fiction novelist that is very well versed in selling his books. In a recently censored YouTube interview at London Real, Brian Rose even presented him as a ‘professional conspiracy theorist’:

Duration: 24:56

He is not a source of information, but in this part of the censored video (posted here because I despise censorship), he nailed almost perfectly story about the Covid-19. That is revealing the truth so he can sell you a dangers of the 5G high frequency radiation. Spreading the 5G fear led to attack on 5G cell towers in UK and Netherland (installed with Huawei equipment), but not in USA. In Croatia and Russia people attacked anything that they have thought to be 5G cell tower, even if it wasn’t.

Some of his followers mentioned that he accused Elon Musk for launching 20,000 5G satellites, probably to fry our brains. Well, whoever believes this is already out of danger. Starlink isn’t a 5G network. works in the Ka-band, with frequencies 26.5–40 GHz, – like for example police radar – while 5G is going to 70–90GHz, which is still far, far below dangerous (ionizing) radiation of 2.4 MILLION GHz.

5G spectrum-photo_2020-05-18_14-37-55.jpg

Aside from the technical stuff in the videos above, U.S. still does not have any operational satellite 5G network, because of latency brick wall, and because the integration of satellite broadband with terrestrial-based networks largely depends on other players – majority of patents are held by Chinese (Huawei & ZTE) and South Korean (Samsung & LG) corporations, and Musk didn’t ask them for the rights, but FCC.

THE REAL DANGER

Second aim of the globalists, is to hide true danger of 5G through senseless story, and you can find it in the last part of the text Coronavirus: Censorship and Satanism… The globalists are thinking in terms: “To whom sheeple belong?” It is a battle for control over the population. The one with better technology is going to take over globalist project. So far, Chinese 5G technology isn’t just superior, it is also cheaper, and Chinese corporations have three times more patents, and are far quicker in filing new patents.

So, there are some serious geopolitical interests involved, which are shaping globalists plans for the conquering of the planet. All the fuss is about preventing China to set new network standards, and of surveillance that U.S. can’t control any more.

And one more important point — there are things in your everyday life that can kill you much faster than any radiation, from 1G to 5G. For example, food and drink full of sugar – Coca Cola, Pepsi and the rest of ‘soft’ drinks. GMO products – Monsanto, Dow, Cargill… Then tobacco companies. Alcohol pushers. Big Pharma – did you know that prescribed drugs like Oxycontin, Oxycodon, Fentanyl and other Big Pharma ‘painkillers’, since 2017 are killing over 70.000 Americans a year. More than whole Vietnam war in a year! On average, 130 Americans die every day from an opioid overdose. Dreadful murderers. Johnson&Johnson has pulled its talcum powder from shelves in the US and Canada – but not in the rest of the World – due to repeatedly paying fines because of highly carcinogenic asbestos was found in their baby product – again! And they are also working on Covid-19 vaccine! It would be much better for public health if people would destroy their products and factories…

Instead, fear is projected to 5G. And BTW, if you don’t believe me, you can protect yourself from 5G radiation very easy – don’t use it if you fear of it! 5G is intelligent enough to broadcast its signal beam aiming the user phone, and does not broadcast all the time in all directions. Therefore, you are protected if you don’t have it. If you already have 5G, simply put your phone in a holster, and you are protected since the signal cannot penetrate anything.

You can’t protect yourself from the 5G cameras that can recognize your face and follow you in real time – and that is much more dangerous. Just remember “Slaugterbots”…

5G is the only missing link for this tech to go live…

Waiting for a 5G smartphone with a scrambler device and a fancy face mask.

* * *

Google detox starts here!

PocketNet

Check out ABRA and easily invest in 28 cryptocurrencies or BIT10, an index of the top cryptos. Use this link to sign up and get $25 in free bitcoin after your first Bank/Amex deposit, or 1.5% cash back when you exchange cryptos

1GZQG69sEKiMXKgGw9TcGcUCBoC4sC1ZYp

#informationwar #news #health #covid-19 #coronavirus #5g #science #creativecoin #neoxian #teamserbia

4 years ago in Deep Dives by lighteye (75)

$8.41

Sort:

Trending

[-]

oldoneeye (59) 4 years ago (edited)

It seems you have fallen into a trap yourself.
There are 2 ways to be fooled:
1 - to believe what isn't true.
2 - to refuse to believe what is true.

Inferring that there is 'no evidence', by failing to find it yourself, is not evidence of 'no evidence'.

It isn't even just about 5g. All generations are damaging. The evidence has been known since the 70s, at least, scientifically, but probably earlier than that too.
There are about 200 more rabbit holes to venture down before even beginning to see how Icke and Co (Jones, Adams, etc..) are there to fool both sides. The believers and the deniers.
Around that time, "Skeptic" sites start flashing their red lights into your head, and you stop falling for their crap too.

Ultimately, throw them all out, and look for yourself if you actually want some semblance of 'truth'.
What you are doing with this piece is just as damaging as what Icke has done to the truth about 1-5G. Obfuscating the Truth.
Could you really not find anything on your own, other than some controlled opposition level 2 'conspiracy theowy' bullshit, designed to make people -throw the baby out with the bathwater- ?

You may really want to read through this paper then, to start your hunt for the Truth, if you so care about it.. A Soviet study, translated by NASA, and hidden from the public for decades. There is some serious shit in it my friend. I have others too, if you are interested.:

INFLUENCE OF MICROWAVE RADIATION ON THE ORGANISM OF MAN AND ANIMALS
Edited by I. R. Petrov
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION • WASHINGTON, D. C. • fEBRUARY 1972

https://drive.google.com/file/d/15g_Q8QL9XUF-pL4HXhxyuuGbxv4nIQWq/view

$0.07

2 votes

[-]

lighteye (75) 4 years ago

Thanks for the document, @oldoneeye. This is about possible military use of microwaves, but it is not the only possible use of these frequencies. Not every microwave radiation use is dangerous. For a military use you have to use enormous amounts of focused energy. 5G broadcasting is not focused, and the energy is just 0.5W. Are you afraid of your lightbulb? You have the explanation of possible military use in the Real Engineering video that starts around 12:00 mark. And also, anyone who is trying to prove that any of it so far is dangerous, should first answer the simple question: Where are the deaths?

Cancer Stat Facts20200519_152609.jpg

So, we have a phantom danger of radiation, and a real danger described in the final section. Can you prove it otherwise?

$0.00

[-]

oldoneeye (59) 4 years ago

This is about possible military use of microwaves

This should be all one needs to know, to get one to stop falling for the BS on both sides.

For a military use you have to use enormous amounts of focused energy.

Define 'enormous'. I mean, contrary to the paper I linked which you have most likely not yet read, it is not 'enormous' in my view.

Where are the deaths?

The trap that you have fallen for that I previously mentioned, is the Red Herring. Following simple Logic, one can see that there are many possible factors that can answer your own question for you. Where are they? To answer that, one first has to be under the fear based impression that 'crazy people' think that holding a phone to your head will cause you to drop dead. This is another fallacy in itself in the war of words.

David Icke and Co. have successfully fooled both sides of the spectrum for many years with this kind of shit, and it appears that I am not going to be able to get through you with my words either. Your opinions are obviously, enshrined in the opposite spectrum of those that you are attempting to call out to with your blog. Just like a Religous Zealot vs Athiest debate. Both miss the point, yet argue for eternity.. Democrats and Republicans, same thing....

The "Deaths" you are looking for, are not what you should be looking for.

And one more important point — there are things in your everyday life that can kill you much faster than any radiation

This is quite true, and I can choose whether or not to eat/drink/use those things, can't I? But, can I choose whether or not to bath in your beloved radiation? I cannot, unless I go into a cave. A bullet can also kill me faster than any radiation.

Read the real science. It isn't about dropping dead. It is about Exacerbation. It is about Degeneration. It is about control.
When Icke says "5g causes coronavirus!", that is when you are supposed to not throw the proverbial baby out with the bathwater. YOu are supposed to look between his nonsense, and the nonsense from the opposition which you are now promoting. The Truth. These frequencies will Exacerbate ANY disease. Exacerbate, not cause.

Read the paper thoroughly. Otherwise you will still be debating me with your limited knowledge, and making arguments that you yourself can debunk, if you study the truth thoroughly, and ignore these clowns on the nutty and "skeptic" sides.

$0.03

1 vote

[-]

oldoneeye (59) 4 years ago

So, we have a phantom danger of radiation, and a real danger described in the final section. Can you prove it otherwise?

Woops I meant to include my reply to this on the last one sorry.
Since I do not consider it 'phantom', due to the evidence, then I am not sure how to answer you. I agree with you about the 'real danger' you suppose, but I do not agree with your 'phantom' premise, nor does actual science.

$0.00

[-]

acesontop (79) 4 years ago

Would you use a 5G smartphone? Would you like to have 5G being beamed at you day and night at up to 300 GHZ? I guess these are the questions at the end of the day. I, for example, wouldn't like that. Ever since we got 3G introduced to our phones it is proven through measurements that every newer G radiates more than the previous one, hence it makes me believe that 4G will be a baby when 5G will be launched world wide. Moreover, I am that cautious, probably excessively, that I don't even use WI-FI at home. I still have my router on my desk but the cable is directly connected into my laptop. Having the router that close to me, I used to get head aches very often but, not anymore. Now, I don't agree entirely with what you wrote in this post but, it surely deserves a reblog, as I see a lot of effort to compile it, and definitely a topic worth discussed.

$0.05

2 votes

[-]

lighteye (75) 4 years ago

Would you use a 5G smartphone?

Yes. Its radiation is no more dangerous than 4G.

Would you like to have 5G being beamed at you day and night at up to 300 GHZ

Please, @acesontop, read the text and see the videos. 5G does not broadcast all the time, and it is not 300GHz. And it is not frequency that is dangerous.

$0.00

[-]

acesontop (79) 4 years ago

I read the whole text, I didn't watched the videos because I don't like the official media outlets but, if everything is OK around 5G why don't telecom companies invite the conspiracy theorists to talk open on national TV channels, test live the damn tech and have a clear answer so we can't talk talk any longer of conspiracy theories. All the media does is calling people like David Icke a professional conspiracy theorist, ridiculing his work and laugh at such theories. If it's just theory why youtube fight on banning him and people like doctor Rashid Buttar, who also mentioned in his videos about 5G and got banned. Why do they ban them? Isn't anyone entitled to freedom of speech?
If you believe that I just rushed to comment on your posts and pour my ideas before actually reading it, you are wrong, I really read it entirely. I respect your views but I still have my suspicions regarding 5G and if authorities have the minimum common sense they should confront the conspiracy theorists and prove their theories are complete nonsense. However, they don't do that. I don't agree with anything David Icke says, by the way but, over the years, some of his theories have come to be true, and Orwell's as well.

$0.03

1 vote

[-]

lighteye (75) 4 years ago

Why do they ban them? Isn't anyone entitled to freedom of speech?

That’s corporatocracy – the worst fascist strain of capitalism ever. They have taken over states, that is why.

If you believe that I just rushed to comment on your posts and pour my ideas before actually reading it, you are wrong, I really read it entirely. I respect your views but I still have my suspicions regarding 5G

I understand your suspicion, but it must be focused onto the real danger, and not onto the fictitious one.

$0.00

[-]

frot (69) 4 years ago

Thanks for posting this info - I'll be looking into this more now because of your article.

Red pills are interesting, and so are reverse red pills!

$0.04

1 vote

[-]

lighteye (75) 4 years ago

You are welcome, @frot, and thank you for the support.

$0.03

1 vote

[-]

frot (69) 4 years ago

Any thoughts on this? - https://lifeenergysolutions.com/blog/the-5g-alarm-clock-waking-up-to-a-new-humanity/

Personally I think cell phones are mind programming devices whatever G they are.

But there is something not right about a lot of the alt-media coverage too.

$0.00

1 vote

[-]

lighteye (75) 4 years ago

This guy is trying to sell you fear, @frot. Don’t fall for his story. As for this:

Personally I think cell phones are mind programming devices whatever G they are.

The cell phones are tracking devices. They are a perfect spies only. There is one extremely efficient mind programming device, a device that does indescribable and irreparable damage to humanity. A device that people install themselves in their homes. It is called – a TV set. It’s a brainwashing machine.

$0.02

1 vote

[-]

informationwar (64) 4 years ago

Curated for #informationwar (by @aagabriel)

Our purpose is to encourage posts discussing Information War, Propaganda, Disinformation, and Liberty. We are a peaceful and non-violent movement that sees information as being held back by corrupt forces in the private sector and government. Our Mission.
Discord, website, youtube channel links here.