You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Candace Owens is taking on facebook for censoring her...it is about time someone pushed back on these cyber-tyrrants!

in #informationwar4 years ago

This is actually not on topic, so it would qualify as a spam comment.

It bothers me to see a double down vote, as that looks like the use of a bot to double down vote to censor comments on my page.

This is what helped kill steemit, and it worries me to see this happen on palnet....

Be safe!

:'(

Sort:  

Do you want to join my Telegram group chat?

I am reduced to an Android right now, so until I get my new desktop done; im limiting my online time.

:-(

Do you trust Google Android? You could install a Linux system onto your phone.

Linex is what palnet choked upon, and since it is a blockchain and permanently searchable, googke is okay, since they will be analyzing it anyway.

But I am looking for a purpose built unix phone.

:)>

Why Unix and not Linux?

Unix based, I am open to all!

My assumption is that due to the limited processing power in a hand held, combined with limited storage capacity; that a minimal system will be the most likely OS.

A Linex install, will cost 20 to 30 G of memory.

:)>

There are different kinds of Linux operating systems and other forks or spin-off OSes too and some of them are less than 10 G of memory. So, in other words, I'm not talking about Ubuntu and some of the different flavors of Ubuntu for example as they can be bigger than 20 G depending on the programs you download. Some of it can be customizable. But Ubuntu is an example of a larger Linux-based OS. But don't let the larger heavyweights scare you away. But of course, Linux is like a grandchild of Unix. So, if the OS is lightweight and if it does the job, then that is good. I've not used Unix OSes yet but I probably should experiment on some of them. I may need to have smaller OSes for older or smaller computers, phones, devices, etc.

@smithlabs, so, @logic copied and pasted that last message 3 times making it, according to some to be spam. I don't care if a comment is copied and pasted and repeated again and again but that is beside the point. I bring it up to say some people deem it as spam and will say different things to me for many years now going back to the 2010's accusing me of being spam. I end up accidentally saying the same things to many people. Many people say "How are you?" to people again and again and that could be considered spam to say hello and how are you kind of things. Because humans are full of repetition. The definition of spam is anything a person does not like. Spam has the same definition as hate speech being anything you do not like. Hate speech and thought crimes are stuff a person does not like which is subjective and relative and not objective to the individual.

My biggest worry, is seeing obvious bots used only for gang down votes!

THAT out of control bot use, Is what killed Steemit...SMH!

I don't mind short comments, as long as they forward the post. Some long ones never address the post; but simply preach their message, to ram it down our throats!

I think the bot problem needs to be outside the allowed operation on hive and palnet!

>:(

I actually don't mind any comment at all, good or bad. If anybody should decide which comments should be allowed, it should simply be you, me, or the individual who authors a post, let them decide what appears on his or her post and not outside entities.

Fighting on a blockchain is a waste of time and energy. I have been attacked by liberals, with a bot army on steemit; and my friends voted them, and their bots, into oblivion!

Some people need to get a little thicker skin....

>:(

It can be symbolic too to have a fight to the extent it can teach others some lessons.

Combat is a liberal replacement for debate, which they can Not win. In a battle of wits, they are unarmed....

So if you bother to fight with them, you are allowing them to control the debate. This I refuse to do, they can learn to debate, or get the hell off my page!

That is how I prefer to teach, LOL!

♡♡♡♡♡

Agreed.

My 3 alleged spam comments were replies to his 3 almost identical comments spreading nonsense ("logic said I am spam", etc).
Just because this comment spammer wrote that sc-fund account is a bot does not make it so. Downvotes are manual. Please do a basic check-up before engaging in comments with this user.

The user has been spamming comments on introductory posts of new users. It has been happening for a long time.

Capture.JPG

Capture2.JPG

https://hive.blog/steemcleaners/@steemcleaners/the-art-of-commenting

I looked at the bot account, he said nothing about it.

When I find an account, that has no posts, no commrnts, and no replies, it is an obvious bot intended to amplify (punish) an account just to be worthy of punishment.

This bot mess helped kill steemit, and this is the first bot I have seen on palnet or hive. I'm not happy to see it, I must admit.

He has been posting comments that were germane to my post for a long while.

He was having OS Problems that contributed to this problem.

Be blessed, and watch out for liberal rioters....

:)>

You have no clue what you are talking about. Just because the owner of the account does not comment or post, it does not mean that the account must be a bot and every downvote must be a bot.
Despite that only selected comments by this user were downvoted by sc-fund. The ones that comment-spammed on introductory posts published by females. It is an evident example of manual downvoting.
Besides who cares if the downvotes on these comments were automatic or manual. It has nothing to do with anything. The user has a long history of spamming comments. Was asked to stop already twice in the past. Now continued again and were asked multiple times to stop the last streak fo spam commenting.

"This bot mess helped kill steemit, and this is the first bot I have seen on palnet or hive. I'm not happy to see it, I must admit"

I have no clue what you are talking about.
You don't make any sense. sc-fund account killed Steemit? facepalm

I will try again. Bots (not this specific bot ) used to censor others, destroyed the steemit platform. These platforms thrive on posts and comments.

Link me to anything this bot has done to originate or improve any post on this platform.

They are an attack mechanism, intended to limit any concepts and ideas, that the bot owner does not agree with. This is usually used to avoid debate where the bot creator will loose.

>:(

"Link me to anything this bot has done to originate or improve any post on this platform"

What bot????

...by the way. All these spam comments are left on female introductions. facepalm